...
By Soo Kim
Reporter
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
The United States placed 23rd in the 2026 World Happiness Report (WHR), trailing several smaller and less wealthy nations despite its global economic influence.
The annual report, which ranked 147 countries, is published by the University of Oxford’s Wellbeing Research Centre in partnership with Gallup, the UN Sustainable Development Solutions Network, and the WHR editorial board.
While the U.S. moved up one place from last year’s ranking, this year’s results again highlight a gap between the material resources in the U.S. and its residents’ reported life satisfaction. Mental health professionals and other experts told Newsweek that structural and cultural factors may help explain the U.S.’s relatively low ranking.
Read More on Life
The WHR bases its rankings on “life evaluations” collected through the Gallup World Poll. Respondents are asked to assess their lives using the Cantril Ladder, a scale from zero to 10, where zero represents the worst possible life and 10 the best possible life.
In 2026, Nordic countries once again dominated the top of the list. Finland ranked first, followed by Iceland, Denmark, Costa Rica, Sweden, Norway, the Netherlands, Israel, Luxembourg and Switzerland. Costa Rica’s sixth-place finish marked the highest ranking ever achieved by a Latin American country. The U.S., by contrast, ranked just below Saudi Arabia, which came in at 22nd, according to the report.
Stress, Disconnection and the American Model
Psychiatrist Dr. Sam Zand, the founder and CEO of the Anywhere Clinic, told Newsweek that the country often shows “a mismatch between their international success and their internal well-being.”
“Although the U.S. provides many of its people with plenty of resources, from a holistic mental health perspective, there is often a high level of stress, disconnection, and dysregulation in their nervous systems,” Zand said.
He contrasted the American emphasis on productivity with the priorities of higher-ranking countries. “Countries who have higher rankings will usually focus on balance and community while also having consistent social support, which helps protect against mental and physical health issues,” Zand said. “Conversely, the U.S. generally puts a higher value on productivity and individual achievement, often at the expense of rest, social connection, and emotional stability.”
According to Zand, psychological theory suggests that happiness is shaped less by material possessions and more by everyday experiences of safety and support. “Happiness is more related to day-to-day feeling of safety, social connection, and support versus the number of possessions,” he said, adding that when those needs are not consistently met, “overall well-being will decline.”
Economic Pressure and Social Isolation
Stephanie Johnson, a licensed clinical psychologist, highlighted economic strain as a major factor weighing on Americans’ sense of well-being. “It’s so hard to make ends meet now and the younger generations won't even be able to afford apartments on their own anymore,” Johnson told Newsweek. “So they’re still living at home with their parents, and it just doesn’t make them feel like they have much to hope for.”
Johnson also pointed to cultural shifts that have reduced time spent with friends and family. “We don’t spend as much quality time with friends and family anymore,” she said. “We’re either always working or at school, and we’re really not spending that quality time that we actually need...”
She added that social media and the internet may intensify dissatisfaction through constant comparison. “We see all this social comparison with what other people have, which highlights the feeling within us that, you know, we don’t have the same things, and so we’re not good enough,” Johnson said.
Weaker Social Support and Trust
Suzie White is an assistant professor at the University of Cincinnati who leads courses in educational leadership, equity, well-being, and systems change. White told Newsweek that the U.S. lags behind higher-ranking countries on several indicators closely tied to life satisfaction. These include “social support, health, perceived freedom, and trust in institutions.”
“Social support, meaning having someone to rely on in times of need, stands out as especially important,” White said.
Culture, Policy and the Pace of Life
Stephanie Krauss, a speaker and author who has developed national well-being frameworks, said the U.S. ranking reflects deeper cultural and policy choices. “It’s no surprise that the United States continues to rank below the 20 happiest nations in the world,” she said. Research shows that life satisfaction improves when people feel healthy, socially connected, and able to manage stress, she added.
“Unfortunately, many Americans struggle to protect the very human essentials that lead to those outcomes,” Krauss said. Compared with residents of higher-ranked countries, Americans “work more, enjoy less leisure time, live farther from family, and struggle with extremely high stress levels.” She also pointed to precarity and the lack of policy buffers such as affordable housing and accessible medical care.
“In America, our normal is not natural,” Krauss said. “Market and modern forces, rather than human needs, have formed societal norms,” contributing to chronic busyness, loneliness and mental health challenges.
Krauss emphasized that the U.S. is not uniform. She cited Hawaii and Loma Linda, California, as examples of communities that prioritize relationships, healthy living and social connection. Still, she argued that broader change is needed. “For Americans to be happier, we must rehuman how we live, learn, and work,” she said, calling for policies and practices that support a more "humane pace of life" and greater collective care.
Do you have a health or wellness-related story to share? Let us know via life@newsweek.com, and your story could be featured on Newsweek.
...
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines