...
By Melik Abdul
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
I’ve voted for Donald Trump three times, and I argued his coalition could realign American politics for a generation—not for one term, but for the era that follows. So, watching him hand the nation’s spy agencies to Bill Pulte this week, a housing official with no intelligence background, I keep landing on a harder question: What’s left of Trump's legacy if he’s willing to burn it all down?
That’s the part getting lost. Trump wasn’t elected only to win. He was elected on the promise that a working-class, multiracial coalition could outlast him and remake the Republican Party for good.
That ambition wasn’t far-fetched. Trump is the first generational figure our party has produced since Ronald Reagan—the first Republican in 40 years with the standing to redefine what the party is, not merely win an election. Reagan did exactly that, and the movement he built outlasted him by a generation. The opening is real. What Trump does with it is the whole question.
Read More on Opinion
Right now, that promise is being tested. The early returns aren’t encouraging.
...
The trouble isn’t that the base has soured. It hasn’t. The trouble is that the administration has turned inward, chasing fights that thrill the faithful but build nothing durable. Renaming the Kennedy Center. A transgender service ban. Tariff brinkmanship. These play well with the people who were never going anywhere. They’ve done little for others in that 77 million Americans who actually put Trump back in office, most of whom don’t treat any of it as an existential crisis.
That’s the cost of governing by applause. You spend capital on symbols and end up with a second term carrying more asterisks than the first.
Look at how many of these fights end. A federal judge ordered Trump’s name stripped from the Kennedy Center, ruling that only Congress can rename it. An appeals court blocked the military’s transgender ban for current service members, with the majority calling the policy “both arbitrary and based upon animus.” Act on a shaky legal theory, watch a court throw it out, and the win turns into a headline about losing. Ashes don’t build anything.
Then there’s the self-inflicted damage.
Voter ID and proof of citizenship are genuinely popular ideas. But Trump turned the SAVE Act into a loyalty test he knew the Senate would never pass. There were never 60 votes, and no appetite to end the filibuster to find them. It was red meat. And it helped end John Cornyn’s career. Cornyn’s sin wasn’t disloyalty; he cosponsored the bill. His sin was not being MAGA enough, fast enough.
That’s the Cornyn effect: Trump trading the party’s interest for his own. He threw his weight behind Ken Paxton, a scandal-plagued attorney general, and Paxton won the nomination. Now, a Senate seat in a state Trump carried by 14 points is a race Democrats think they can win.
Here’s the strategic problem nobody in the inner circle wants to say out loud. Trump needs votes. He needs them for his agenda and for his nominations. And the senators he’s spent the past year humiliating—Cornyn, Cassidy, the outgoing members with nothing left to lose—are exactly the votes he’ll have to find. A lame-duck senator who’s been told he isn’t wanted owes the White House nothing. That isn’t loyalty. It’s leverage, and Trump just handed it away.
Pulte is the clearest tell. He built his name running a private equity firm focused on homebuilding and a Detroit nonprofit that demolished blighted homes—and, lately, mining mortgage records to go after the president's enemies. That might qualify him to run a housing agency. It says nothing about the judgment required to oversee the intelligence community and the President’s Daily Brief. He fit an ideological mold. That was the qualification.
This is the deeper risk. Movements built entirely around one man don’t survive him.
The Tea Party failed in part because it was a loose confederation of dissidents with no central figure to hold it together. MAGA has the opposite problem. It has a figure, and only a figure. When the people around Trump insist that he alone decides what MAGA is, they confirm there’s no MAGA without him. The last time Republicans built an “America First” insurgency, it belonged to Pat Buchanan—and it went dormant the day he left the stage, surviving only as an idea that waited decades for a new standard-bearer.
A movement that can’t name a successor isn’t a realignment. It’s a personality. And personalities expire.
Reagan understood the difference. His legacy wasn’t a roster of enemies; it was an idea, an optimism, and a bench deep enough to govern once he was gone. He even handed his party an unofficial commandment: speak no ill of a fellow Republican. Trump has inverted it. The energy now runs toward conflict, retaliation, brute force, and loyalty tests—incumbents purged for insufficient zeal, allies graded on fealty rather than results. That can be a method of winning. The open question is whether it can also be a legacy.
None of this is settled. Trump still has the rarest thing in politics: a coalition he actually assembled. The question was never whether he could win. He proved that. The question is whether he can govern in a way that leaves something standing.
For those of us who believed in 2016 that this could be generational, the worst outcome isn’t defeat. It’s a legacy remembered with an asterisk—a list of fights picked, courts lost, and allies discarded, next to a coalition that couldn’t outlive the man who built it.
You don’t protect a legacy by burning down everything around it. You protect it by naming an heir—and so far, the only one Trump has named is himself.
Melik Abdul is a D.C.-based public affairs professional and Republican strategist.
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines