GettyImages-628055952

...

Tom Porter

By Tom Porter

0

Share

Newsweek is a Trust Project member

See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.


A New York judge refused to throw out a case against two psychologists who devised interrogation techniques, which critics claim constitute torture.

Three plaintiffs have alleged they were detained and tortured in secret CIA prisons in the wake of 9/11, using techniques devised by psychologists James Mitchell and John Bruce Jessen.

Lawyers for the plaintiffs claim the former CIA contractors "aided and abetted the torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment" suffered by their clients, reported the New York Times.

Read More on U.S.

So what are the techniques Mitchell and Jessen helped devise?

The 13 enhanced interrogation techniques used by the CIA were listed in a 2014 Senate Intelligence Committee report, which condemned the torture of terror suspects carried out as part of the CIA's detention and interrogation program post 9/11.

The following techniques are used:

Do they constitute torture?

Lawyers for two of the plaintiffs argue their clients suffered PTSD as a result of the use of the techniques, which they argue constitute torture. One of the plaintiffs died whilst in custody in Afghanistan in 2002, probably of hypothermia, and the lawsuit is being brought by his family.

Plaintiff Mohamed Ben Soud, a Libyan who was detained by the CIA in Afghanistan was locked in small boxes, slammed against a wall and doused with buckets of ice water while naked and shackled. Suleiman Salim, a Tanzanian captured in 2003 and also held by the CIA in Afghanistan, was beaten, isolated in a dark cell for months, doused with water and deprived of sleep. Gul Rahman died in CIA custody in Afghanistan in 2002.

Mitchell and Jessen have argued in court depositions that the techniques they devised cause no long-term damage to prisoners, and are mostly painless. However they have claimed they wished to stop or limit the use of waterboarding, but were placed under pressure by the CIA.

The pair received up to $1,800 a day each as contractors, then set up a company that was paid $81 million to carry out and expand the interrogation program over several years. Their lawyers claim they should not face punishment, as it was the CIA who decided who would be interrogated using the methods.

Are they still used?

Most of these techniques are now banned by the United States.

U.S. President Donald Trump is a proponent of torture, but has held back from authorizing it in face of opposition from his national security team.

View 0 Comments

Request Reprint & Licensing

Submit Correction

View Editorial & AI Guidelines