...
By Billal Rahman
Immigration Reporter
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
The U.S. State Department has formally rejected a United Nations migration declaration, accusing the international body of promoting what it described as "replacement immigration" in the United States and across Europe—a phrase that has become politically and rhetorically charged in recent years.
In a statement released Monday, the department said Washington would not participate in the International Migration Review Forum (IMRF) and would not support the "progress declaration" adopted at the meeting, held at U.N. headquarters in New York from May 5 to May 8.
"The United States did not participate in the International Migration Review Forum and will not support the May 8 'progress' declaration," said the statement, adding that the administration objects to U.N. efforts "to advocate and facilitate replacement immigration in the United States and across the broader West."
Read More on News
The U.N. has not yet publicly responded. Newsweek has contacted the organization for comment.
...
Why This Matters Now
The language used by the State Department represents a notable shift in U.S. diplomatic rhetoric—and arrives amid a broader escalation in immigration enforcement at home and growing tension with allies abroad.
Since returning to office in January 2025, President Donald Trump's administration has paired aggressive deportation efforts with tighter restrictions on legal immigration pathways. At the same time, U.S. officials have publicly criticized European governments over migration levels and border policies, contributing to widening diplomatic rifts with several NATO and EU partners.
The explicit invocation of "replacement immigration" has drawn scrutiny because the phrase overlaps linguistically—though not conceptually—with the "Great Replacement" conspiracy theory, a far‑right ideology widely rejected by scholars and civil‑rights organizations.
What the UN Forum Actually Does
The IMRF is the primary global platform for governments to review implementation of the Global Compact for Safe, Orderly and Regular Migration, a nonbinding framework adopted in 2018.
The compact aims to:
- Improve international cooperation on migration governance
- Expand lawful migration pathways
- Combat human trafficking and exploitation
- Strengthen migrant protections and data sharing
The United States withdrew from negotiations on the compact in 2017 during Trump’s first term. The Biden administration later endorsed the compact's vision in 2021, but the second Trump administration has now again rejected participation in the IMRF process.
What 'Replacement Migration' Means in U.N. Research
The phrase "replacement migration" originates not in political advocacy but in demographic analysis.
A 2001 report by the U.N. Population Division, titled Replacement Migration: Is It a Solution to Declining and Ageing Populations?, used the term to describe the level of international migration that would be required to offset population decline, workforce shrinkage, or population aging in low‑fertility countries.
The report examined scenarios for countries including the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, and France, and defined replacement migration strictly as a statistical concept, not a policy recommendation.
"The study did not advocate migration as a solution," the report noted, but rather modeled demographic outcomes under different fertility and migration assumptions.
U.N. officials and participating states emphasize that the compact does not impose binding migration quotas or override national sovereignty, a point repeatedly stated in U.N. documentation.
The US Immigration Context
Recent U.S. demographic data underscore why the topic has re‑entered political debate.
According to the Pew Research Center, the U.S. immigrant population reached a record 53.3 million in January 2025 before declining to 51.9 million by June 2025—the first sustained drop in more than half a century.
Pew attributed the decline to a combination of factors, including:
- Increased deportations and enforcement
- Reduced legal entry pathways
- Policy changes affecting asylum and temporary protections
Immigrants accounted for 15.4 percent of the U.S. population in June 2025, down from 15.8 percent earlier that year.
What Is the 'Great Replacement' Theory?
The "Great Replacement" theory is a far‑right conspiracy ideology that claims political and economic elites are deliberately encouraging mass immigration to replace native‑born white populations in Western countries.
The theory was popularized by French writer Renaud Camus and has been widely rejected by historians, demographers, and extremism researchers as unfounded and racist.
Experts note that versions of the theory have been cited by perpetrators of multiple mass‑casualty attacks, including the 2019 Christchurch mosque shootings in New Zealand and the 2022 Buffalo supermarket shooting in New York.
Scholars stress that demographic change driven by migration, fertility differences, and aging populations is not evidence of coordinated replacement, and that conflating statistical modeling with conspiracy narratives can fuel social polarization and violence.
What Happens Next
The State Department’s stance signals that the United States will continue to distance itself from multilateral migration frameworks, even as demographic pressures intensify across developed economies.
Diplomats and policy analysts say the immediate consequences will be diplomatic rather than legal, but warn that the rhetorical framing could complicate cooperation on refugee crises, labor mobility, and anti‑trafficking efforts—areas where coordination with allies and international agencies remains critical.
For now, the U.N. migration forum will proceed without U.S. participation, while debate over immigration levels, demographic change, and political language is likely to intensify both domestically and abroad.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines