10

Loading video...

Jordan KingBrendan ColeLeonardo Feldman

By Jordan King, Brendan Cole, and Leonardo Feldman

0

Share

Newsweek is a Trust Project member

See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.


President Donald Trump says the U.S. will hold a meeting with Iran on Tuesday in Doha, Qatar after both countries agreed to halt days of tit-for-tat strikes around the Strait of Hormuz.

The resumption of hostilities on the weekend had threatened the 'memorandum of understanding' secured by Trump just two weeks ago, which aimed to reopen the critical international shipping lane.

Both sides launched strikes after accusing the other of violating the deal. On Friday, the U.S. hit Iranian military targets in after Iran attacked container ships attempting to move through the strait.

Read More

Hezbollah Rejects Israel-Lebanon Truce As ‘Surrender’6 min read

Hezbollah Rejects Israel-Lebanon Truce As ‘Surrender’

Where the New Middle East Order Stands Today7 min read

Where the New Middle East Order Stands Today

Trump Addresses Iran’s Strait Tolls as UN Launches Evacuation Plan7 min read

Trump Addresses Iran’s Strait Tolls as UN Launches Evacuation Plan

Iran then responded on Sunday with missile and drone strikes targeting U.S. installations in Kuwait and Bahrain.

Trump writing on Truth Social said "Iran has requested the meeting" but Iranian officials are yet to confirm the meeting.

As of Monday morning, Iran's deputy foreign minister, Kazem Gharibabadi, had said the Doha talks had not been confirmed to discuss "technical" issues of the deal.

If talks go ahead, they will focus first on reopening the strait - which Iran has said it still wants to control and charge fees for post the 60-day truce period set up for peace talks. The Trump administration has repeatedly said this would be unacceptable.

Weekend Strikes

On Saturday, an Iranian drone struck a Panama-flagged vessel and the U.S. military responded by targeting Iranian military surveillance infrastructure, communications systems, air defense sites, drone storage facilities and mine-laying capabilities.

The Islamic Revolutionary Guards Corps (IRGC) then threatened U.S. bases in the region in a statement that was followed by drone and ballistic missile attacks on Sunday targeting the U.S. Fifth Fleet Naval Base in Bahrain and the Ali Al Salem Airbase in Kuwait.

The weekend's escalations come less than two weeks after Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian signed a 14-point memorandum of understanding designed to end the conflict and establish a 60-day negotiating period for sanctions, the strait, and Iran's nuclear program.

A snag to the agreement stating fighting must end on all fronts, lies in the conflict in Lebanon. Israel and Lebanon signed a framework deal last week to end the fighting between Israel and Hezbollah, the Iran-aligned group which entered the war on March 2 by launching rockets into Israel in support of Tehran. But Hezbollah rejected the deal signed by the Lebanon government.

Israel has continued attacks into Lebanon, reporting Monday that it struck three Hezbollah command centers following wht it said were violations of the ceasefire agreement.

Since the agreement was signed, Washington and Tehran have repeatedly accused each other of breaking its terms. The U.S. says Iran violated the deal through attacks on commercial shipping and regional targets, while Iran argues successive American strikes have undermined the diplomatic process.

Iranian strikes might be part of a move by Tehran to dissuade the Gulf states from resisting Iranian control over the strait, the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) said.

"Iran may have intended for its strikes to signal to Gulf states that Iran will respond with force to any Gulf opposition to its control of the strait, amid recent Gulf resistance to Iranian management of the waterway," the Washington, D.C., think tank said.

Below is a timeline of the competing claims made by both sides since the agreement took effect.

Rubio Briefs Lawmakers

During a closed-door House briefing on Iran, Republican Congressman Rich McCormick questioned the Trump administration's decision to pursue a memorandum of understanding with Tehran, arguing that Iran has a history of failing to honor past agreements, MS Now reporter Mychael Schnell reported on X, citing an unnamed source.

According to the source on the call, McCormick said he did not understand why the U.S. would seek an agreement with a country "that has never been compliant," adding that easing prewar sanctions could allow Iran to claim victory.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio defended the administration's approach, reportedly telling lawmakers the U.S. should judge Iran by its actions rather than its public statements, according to the source. Rubio also acknowledged the uncertainty surrounding the diplomatic effort, warning that no one was "under any illusion" negotiations would be easy or even successful, but argued the administration believes they are worth attempting despite decades of failed efforts.

View this post on X

Before the briefing, House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries said when asked by Newsweek during a press briefing that, "We need an all-hands-on-deck classified briefing for the entirety of the House of Representatives and the entirety the Senate. This is an incredibly significant matter related to Iran of war and peace.

"And the administration is taking a step in the right direction by holding the unclassified briefing today, but clearly this matter, which has adversely impacted the national security interests of the American people and put Iran in a stronger position relative to the United States than they were in prior to the start of Donald Trump's reckless and costly war of choice in the Middle East requires a full classified briefing for the entire House of Representatives. It's my hope that that will happen sooner rather than later."

Timeline: How Both Sides Say the Deal Was Broken

June 17: U.S. and Iran Sign Memorandum of Understanding

President Donald Trump and Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian signed a 14-point memorandum of understanding intended to end months of fighting. The agreement committed both countries to halt military operations, reopen the Strait of Hormuz, begin lifting the U.S. naval blockade and negotiate a broader peace agreement within 60 days.

June 19: Fighting in Lebanon Sparks First Dispute

Within days of the agreement taking effect, renewed fighting between Israel and Hezbollah threatened the deal. Tehran argued the memorandum required military operations to stop "on all fronts, including Lebanon," and warned the continued Israeli offensive undermined the agreement, according to the Associated Press. U.S. officials maintained the peace process remained on track despite the violence.

Pro-government Iranian demonstrators wave flags from Iran and Lebanon's Hezbollah in Tehran, Iran, on June 7. (AP Photo/Vahid Salemi)

...

June 20: Iran Accuses U.S. of Acting in 'Bad Faith'

Iran accused Washington of failing to implement key provisions of the agreement, pointing to the continuing U.S. naval presence and ongoing disputes over shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. Tehran warned it would continue asserting control over the waterway until its concerns were addressed. U.S. officials rejected Iran's characterization and said maritime traffic remained open.

Sentinel-2 satellite imagery shows an overview of the Strait of Hormuz linking the Persian Gulf with the Gulf of Oman. The waterway was supposed to be reopened under the terms of a deal between Iran and the U.S.

...

June 25: Ever Lovely Attacked in the Strait of Hormuz

The Singapore-flagged container ship Ever Lovely was struck by what British maritime authorities described as an "unknown projectile" while transiting the Strait of Hormuz near Oman.

Two U.S. officials told Reuters they believed Iran was responsible, while Singapore's Maritime and Port Authority said the vessel suffered minor damage to its bridge, but all 21 crew members were safe. The attack prompted the International Maritime Organization to suspend its vessel movement process through the strait.

June 26-27: U.S. Says Iran Violated the Ceasefire

The U.S. military launched retaliatory strikes on Iranian military infrastructure, including drone facilities, surveillance systems and air defenses. U.S. Central Command said Iran "had a chance to honor the ceasefire agreement" but instead attacked commercial shipping, while Trump accused Tehran of violating the memorandum.

View this post on X

June 27: Iran Says U.S. Broke the Agreement

Iran rejected Washington's account and said the American strikes themselves breached the agreement. Tehran argued the U.S. had resumed military operations instead of resolving disputes through the diplomatic mechanisms established under the memorandum and warned that continued attacks could derail negotiations.

June 28: Fresh Strikes Deepen the Crisis

The U.S. carried out another round of strikes on Iranian military targets after Trump said Iran had violated the agreement again. Iran responded with missile and drone attacks targeting Bahrain and Kuwait, while warning the peace process could come to a "complete halt" if Washington continued military action.

Both sides continued to insist the other was responsible for undermining the agreement. Speaking the same day, Araghchi said Iran had “no interest” in allowing its leverage over the strait to erode, adding that continued attempts to reroute ships without Tehran’s approval risk further escalation.

U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio, left, and Bahrain's King Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa share a word after their meeting, at Al-Sakhir Palace near Zallaq, Bahrain, Thursday, June 25, 2026.

...

What's the Dispute Over the Strait of Hormuz?

The Strait of Hormuz has emerged as one of the biggest sticking points in the U.S.-Iran peace process because Washington and Tehran fundamentally disagree over who should control shipping through the strategic waterway.

Under the June 17 memorandum of understanding, Iran agreed to use its "best efforts" to ensure the safe passage of commercial vessels through the strait while demining the route and restoring normal maritime traffic. The agreement also envisioned commercial shipping resuming without charges during a 60-day transition period.

But the two sides have since offered sharply different interpretations of how that should work. The United States and its Gulf allies have backed a U.N.-supported shipping corridor running close to Oman's coastline, arguing it provides the safest route while mine-clearance operations continue. Iran has objected to vessels using that corridor without its approval, insisting it retains authority over navigation through the strait and warning ships not to transit the route without Tehran's permission.

The dispute came to a head after the Singapore-flagged cargo ship Ever Lovely was struck while sailing near the Strait of Hormuz. U.S. officials blamed Iran for the attack and described it as a breach of the memorandum, while Tehran denied responsibility and has continued to argue that subsequent U.S. airstrikes—not its actions—represent the real violation of the agreement.

Contact Newsweek editors on this story: Tobias Meyjes, Edward Pearcey, Anna Commander, and Gray R. Thomas

View 0 Comments

Request Reprint & Licensing

Submit Correction

View Editorial & AI Guidelines