...
By Barney Henderson
Content Director
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
For years, Iran insisted it would never negotiate with the United States under pressure. On Tuesday, that posture cracked.
Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian’s announcement that he has instructed his foreign minister to pursue negotiations with Washington marks a striking reversal for Tehran, and shows the country's leadership is feeling the mounting pressure it is under.
It comes after U.S. strikes on Iranian nuclear sites last summer, simmering internal unrest, and a White House that has made clear it is willing to push Iran to the brink over its nuclear program.
Read More on Analysis
President Donald Trump’s approach—often dismissed by critics as reckless nuclear brinkmanship—now appears to be directly impacting Iran’s calculations.
By tying any talks to Iran’s nuclear program and backing that demand up with threats of new military action, Trump has altered the equation.
Here's why he stands to succeed where every past U.S. president in recent history has failed:
The Turning Point: Trump’s Strikes on Iran’s Nuclear Sites
The June bunker buster strikes on three Iranian nuclear facilities were a turning point. They did not, as Trump claimed, "completely and totally obliterate" Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities. But they did inflict serious damage, with the Pentagon assessing the nuclear program was likely set back by around two years.
However, more significantly, the strikes rattled the regime and introduced a new uncertainty.
Iran’s hand was weakened at precisely the moment it faces economic pressure, regional isolation, and simmering domestic protests.
Trump Doubles Down
Trump last week warned Iran that "time is running out" and that it faces a "far worse" attack than last summer's strikes.
He also wrote on his Truth Social platform: "A massive Armada is heading to Iran. It is moving quickly, with great power, enthusiasm, and purpose.
"It is a larger fleet, headed by the great Aircraft Carrier Abraham Lincoln, than that sent to Venezuela. Like with Venezuela, it is, ready, willing, and able to rapidly fulfill its mission, with speed and violence, if necessary."
The USS Abraham Lincoln carrier strike group is positioned in the Middle East, ready for the order to launch a new military action against the Iranian leadership.
Tehran is clearly paying attention.
Trump has made it clear that the nuclear issue is non-negotiable. Unlike previous administrations that sought to reduce tensions first and then attempt to resolve nuclear disputes later, Trump is reversing the order.
Iran Fears New U.S. Strike ‘Could Topple Regime’
Iran’s leadership fears that a new U.S. strike could break the regime’s hold on power, sources told Reuters.
According to multiple current and former officials, Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei has been warned that public anger after last month’s bloody crackdown on protests has reached a tipping point—and that fear is no longer an effective deterrent.
Renewed external pressure, including a limited American attack, could embolden Iranians to return to the streets and overwhelm security forces, the report said.
"An attack combined with demonstrations by angry people could lead to a collapse (of the ruling system). That is the main concern among the top officials and that is what our enemies want," an official said.
The role of Khamenei is also telling. Pezeshkian’s move would never have been possible without his approval. Khamenei has long rejected direct talks with the U.S. as a sign of weakness. His reversal suggests a regime cornered.
What the Right is Saying
On the hawkish right, the mood is to rally around Trump's hard-line position on Iran.
Republican Senator Rick Scott said last month: "If they go forward again and start building up nuclear facilities, yeah, I think Trump’s going to bomb the hell out of them."
Secretary of State Marco Rubio said last week that Iran is "probably weaker than it has ever been" amid internal dissent and economic collapse.
Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, at a Cabinet meeting last week, warned Iran against pursuing nuclear weapons, saying the United States was ready to act. He said Iran "should not pursue nuclear capabilities," and that "we will be prepared to deliver whatever this president expects of the War Department."
What the Left is Saying
Many on the left have criticized Trump’s pressure and threats toward Iran, describing them as dangerous and potentially unconstitutional.
Democrats have warned Trump against renewed military strikes, warning they could actually strengthen the regime.
Senate Democratic Leader Chuck Schumer said: "It has to be debated by Congress. Something like that, the War Powers Act, the Constitution, requires a discussion in Congress. We’ve had no reach-out from the administration at this point."
One outlier is Democratic Senator John Fetterman, who supports potential strikes on Iran. "If it continues to make more sense, absolutely," Fetterman told CNN. "Now you have that poisonous regime now in spiral. Why wouldn’t we want to support that? Why [wouldn’t] we want to have the kind of targeted action that could break that regime."
What Happens Next
Trump's effective pressure on the regime does not mean a deal is imminent—or even likely. But the fact that talks are even being contemplated shows Tehran is now paying attention.
Trump’s strategy is dangerous, and there is a risk of miscalculation. But Iran’s sudden shift suggests that brinkmanship, when backed by credible action, can produce leverage. Tehran is now pursuing talks not because it trusts Washington. It is acting because it fears what comes next if it does not.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines