10
Loading video...
By Megan Cartwright
Associate News Editor
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
A high school student's punishment for bringing coffee to class has triggered a procedural review of district policies and a nationwide spotlight on open-meeting compliance.
Julie Kaputa, a senior at Beaver River Central School in Lewis County, New York, received an in-school suspension on the first day of school for violating a newly enacted ban on outside food and beverages.
"I walked in, I had my coffee with me," Kaputa told local station WWNY. "I got to my first-period class, and my teacher said, 'I'm either going to need you to dump that out or consume it on the spot or go down to the office.'"
Read More on Education
The disciplinary action will not affect her permanent record.
Challenging the Rule
Rather than contesting only the suspension, Kaputa and her mother scrutinized the adoption of the policy itself. Julie's mother, MaryAnne Kaputa, stated that the family found no public record indicating the district had properly announced a required public hearing prior to enacting the restriction.
"There was no public hearing to discuss it," Julie told WWNY. "Transparency in government is a big thing that I care about a lot, and it just kind of struck me as odd that there wasn't a public hearing."
Bobby Taghavi, a former Orange County prosecutor and current National Managing Partner of Sweet James, told Newsweek that the dispute extends beyond the student's punishment. "This case is bigger than a cup of coffee," he said. "The real issue is whether a government entity followed the required process before enforcing a rule."
...
District Acknowledges Oversight
Superintendent Todd Green maintained that an August board meeting was intended to serve as a public hearing regarding the district's code of conduct. However, following discussions with the Kaputas, Green acknowledged that the session was not clearly advertised to the public as a formal hearing for policy commentary.
"It's good to see students standing up for what they believe in," Green told WWNY. "We really appreciate that. That often doesn't happen."
He added: “We’re a school district. We’re trying to do the best we can throughout this process. We know there’s open meeting laws. We try to follow that. If things get pointed out that we need to do and change or fix, we’ll do that.”
Newsweek reached out to Green via email on Monday for comment.
According to Taghavi, "Schools have broad authority to adopt rules, but they still have to follow the legal process required to enact them."
Related Story
Schools Are Under Attack. Education Must Be Built To Survive | Opinion
Similar Cases
Although few high-profile disputes focus specifically on coffee, several landmark cases highlight the intersection of student rights, due process, and institutional authority:
Morse v. Frederick (2007): A 10-day suspension of an Alaska high school student who displayed a controversial banner that read "Bong Hits 4 Jesus" during a school-supervised Olympic Torch relay reached the U.S. Supreme Court. The 5-4 ruling affirmed that schools may restrict student expression that reasonably encourages illegal drug use during school-supervised activities.
Goss v. Lopez (1975): This landmark ruling from the court established that public school students facing suspension are constitutionally entitled to basic due-process protections and a hearing.
What Happens Next
The dispute ultimately raises a larger procedural question: Can a school system legally enforce a policy if required public-notice steps were not correctly followed?
According to Taghavi, "Those disciplinary actions could be challenged and potentially rescinded, especially if the policy was the sole basis for the punishment."
Contact Newsweek editors for this story: Ben Kelly and Anthony Murray.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines