Liba Taylor/Getty
By Kate Moynihan
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
Walk into almost any classroom in a low- and middle-income country, and you will see a child at the back, squinting at the board, or a student who has stopped raising their hand altogether.
Teachers may mark them as slow, unmotivated, or disruptive. Parents may think they are clumsy or simply going through a phase.
Too often, no one asks the simplest question: can this child actually see what is written in front of them?
Read More on Leadership Insights
This is not a minor gap in the global education conversation. It is a structural blind spot. UNESCO's 2026 Global Education Monitoring Report records 273 million children and youth out of school, a figure that has risen for seven consecutive years.
The world spends enormous sums on teachers, infrastructure, and enrollment drives. Yet one of the most straightforward barriers to learning remains largely invisible to the systems meant to address it.
...
I have seen this firsthand through my work. When a child cannot see clearly, the consequences extend far beyond the classroom.
A child who struggles to read the blackboard may be perceived as distracted or academically behind, when the real issue is simply that they cannot see.
Often, children themselves do not realize anything is wrong because they have never experienced clear vision.
The evidence is not speculative. Research published by the International Agency for the Prevention of Blindness and Seva Foundation estimates that uncorrected refractive error (conditions such as myopia, hyperopia and astigmatism, which can often be corrected with glasses) affects 17.8 million children aged 5 to 17 worldwide.
The same analysis estimates that uncorrected refractive error among schoolchildren could result in $173 billion in lost future economic productivity annually, measured in purchasing-power-parity terms.
Under one modeled scenario, a child who receives glasses at age five and continues wearing them until age 18 could earn 78 percent more over their lifetime than a child whose vision remains uncorrected.
What the data cannot capture is why this problem persists. The answer is not neglect in the ordinary sense. It is a failure of recognition.
The Consequences
Children who have never seen clearly do not know their experience is abnormal. They cannot tell a parent or teacher what is wrong because, to them, nothing is.
Parents living on the edge of survival cannot afford to take a day off work for a hospital visit that does not feel urgent.
Teachers in rural and underserved communities are rarely trained to spot the signs of refractive error, know that help is available, or to know how to get that child glasses or follow-up care.
The consequences radiate outward. When a family member cannot see, someone else must become their eyes. Unpaid care responsibilities often fall disproportionately on women and girls, potentially limiting their opportunities for education and employment.
One pair of glasses, delivered early enough, does not just keep a child in the classroom. It can keep a sister, a daughter, or a future mother from sacrificing her own trajectory.
The solution is not a mystery. School-based vision screening, integrated into existing education and health programs, identifies children before they fall behind.
Training teachers to recognize potential problems and understand referral pathways costs far less than the consequences of inaction.
Community outreach brings screening closer to families who cannot travel. And affordability matters: access means nothing if a family cannot pay for the glasses or the follow-up visit.
Systems, Not Pilots
None of this is theoretical. A 2026 UNESCO and World Bank study estimates benefit-cost ratios of 3.8 to 9.8 for school eye-health programs in Cambodia and Ghana. Costs could approach $1 per child screened when programs are integrated into existing systems.
Vision for the Poor reports that Guatemala is developing a $53 million national eye-care network, launched in 2022, with the aim of expanding access to treatment for millions of people by 2032, with locally trained optometrists staffing new vision centers and an eye hospital.
These are not pilots. They are systems, designed to outlast any single donor or campaign.
If this approach becomes the norm, the picture changes. A child who can see the board stays in school. A student who stays in school learns.
And the girl who might have spent her adolescence caring for a blind relative instead has the chance to build a life of her own.
Grim Arithmetic
If nothing changes, the arithmetic is grim. The 273 million children already out of school will be joined by others who drop out because they cannot keep up.
The $173 billion in annual productivity losses will continue to accumulate. Girls will continue to disappear from classrooms to become caregivers.
The people who can act are not abstract. Education ministers can integrate vision screening into school health protocols. Development agencies can fund teacher training and outreach alongside textbooks.
Philanthropists looking for measurable returns can look at the evidence: IAPB's 2024 research estimates that school vision programs could generate returns of up to $65 for every $1 invested, although the projected returns vary by country.
We are not waiting for a scientific breakthrough. We know how to identify and correct many childhood vision problems. The question is whether we are willing to make clear vision a fundamental part of every child's opportunity to learn.
Kate Moynihan is CEO and Executive Director of Seva Foundation, a nonprofit organization based in Berkeley, California that co-led research cited in this article. All opinions are the author’s own.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines