By Gabe Whisnant
News Editor
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
Former Attorney General Pam Bondi stonewalled House Oversight Committee lawmakers on Friday, refusing to answer questions regarding President Donald Trump’s involvement in the heavily criticized and delayed rollout of the Jeffrey Epstein case files.
During the four-hour, closed-door interview, Bondi remained defiant, citing her voluntary appearance to decline questions about the president. She also deflected operational blame, testifying that acting Attorney General Todd Blanche oversaw the process. Bondi also said there were "redaction errors" during the release of the files.
The high-stakes hearing sparked backlash from committee Democrats who branded the session a "sham," while survivors of Epstein, the convicted sex offender who died by suicide in jail in 2019 awaiting further charges, gathered outside protesting "redaction errors" that exposed victims' personal information.
Read More
Trump DOJ Pumped Brakes on Jeffrey Epstein’s Ranch Probe—Republican6 min read
Pam Bondi Admits Mistakes Over Epstein Files4 min read
Joe Rogan Warns US ‘Vulnerable’ Due to Trump’s Iran War5 min read
...
Bondi Admits 'Redaction Errors' in Files Release
Read Pam Bondi's full statement to the House Oversight Committee:
"Good morning. Before we start today, I want to reiterate what I have said many times regarding the Department's handling during my tenure as Attorney General of the voluminous materials that are now commonly known as the Epstein Files.
I am proud of the Department's record and commitment to transparency under my leadership. We demonstrated an unprecedented commitment to transparency in the Department's search for, collection, and review of the Epstein files, producing nearly 3 million pages of material, including thousands of videos and hundreds of thousands of images.
These investigations span FOUR administrations, dating back to the Bush administration and have gone on through the Obama administration, the first Trump administration, and the Biden administration. The only time federal prosecutors were permitted to launch investigations against Epstein and Maxwell was when President Trump occupied the White House. Only under President Trump were 3 million Epstein-related documents released.
This was an enormously complicated and labor-intensive process. To the best of my knowledge, the Department produced everything required under the Epstein Files Transparency Act. Our diligent and good faith effort to collect materials ensured that all potentially responsive documents that could be reasonably located would see the light of day. All Department components were directed to submit any potentially responsive records, resulting in a comprehensive review of millions of documents. As the head of a large Department with broad responsibilities, I did not lead every aspect of this effort or conduct that document review myself. I delegated oversight over this process to Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche. The team of professionals who reviewed all of the materials that we collected assured me the only materials that were withheld were either non-responsive, privileged, or duplicative. Although not required by the Act, the Department has given Congress access to unredacted, duplicative materials in the Reading Room in an effort at maximum transparency.
There were redaction errors. But since day one of this process, this Department has been committed to accountability and transparency. Our stance has always been that the Department stands ready to review any potential evidence of criminal activity related to Epstein and his associates and would pursue appropriate investigative or prosecutorial action wherever the facts and law warrant.
I would like to repeat what I shared before the House Judiciary Committee in February: I have spent my entire career fighting for victims and I will continue to do so. I am deeply sorry for what any victim has been through, especially as a result of that monster. If they have any information to share with law enforcement about anyone who has hurt them or abused them, the FBI is waiting to hear from them.
The bottom line is: justice and transparency in this matter have been delivered at the direction of President Trump and his administration."
Pam Bondi Speaks Out After Testimony
Following the hearing, Bondi blasted remarks by Democrats in posts on X.
Representative Robert Garcia of California said that Bondi "continues to push all of the investigation and the blame on Acting AG Todd Blanche."
Bondi said in response, "NOT TRUE. I praised Acting AG Blanche’s management of this Herculean task. I said his ethics are beyond reproach and that he is an incredible Attorney General."
Representative James Walkinshaw of Virginia told reporters that when Bondi was asked whether Trump had early knowledge of Epstein’s crimes, she stopped short of a blanket denial. Instead of asserting the president knew nothing, Bondi replied, according to Walkinshaw, “I’m not certain of the extent of his knowledge.”
The former attorney general responded on X, "MISREPRESENTATION by Walkinshaw. What the world knows to be true is President Trump banned Epstein from Mar a Lago decades ago bc Epstein was a despicable creep!!"
Why Did Pam Bondi Testify Before the House Oversight Committee?
The House Oversight Committee subpoenaed Bondi as part of a sweeping, bipartisan investigation into the federal government's handling of Epstein across multiple presidential administrations. Lawmakers are investigating why the massive document dump faced significant delays, whether political interference stalled investigations into high-profile Epstein associates, and the extent of Trump’s personal involvement in the process.
Friday's closed-door session followed intense political brinkmanship. After Bondi failed to appear for an initially scheduled April deposition following her sudden exit from the Department of Justice (DOJ), committee Democrats threatened her with a civil contempt of Congress resolution. To avert a formal contempt vote, Bondi agreed to sit for a transcribed interview to address structural failures and transparency issues within the department she recently led.
...
When Were the Epstein Files Released?
The document releases were mandated by the Epstein Files Transparency Act, a bipartisan bill overwhelmingly passed by Congress and signed into law by Trump on November 19, 2025. The legislation forced the DOJ to compile and publish all unclassified records regarding Epstein and his co-conspirator, Ghislaine Maxwell, within a strict window.
The resulting rollout occurred in turbulent, highly criticized waves. The first major tranche of files was published on December 19, 2025, followed by multiple consecutive daily drops. A massive fifth wave on January 30, 2026, brought the total public disclosure to more than 3.5 million pages, alongside thousands of videos and images. A sixth, cleanup release was published on March 5, 2026, to restore approximately 50,000 files that had been improperly removed during the chaotic initial review.
Why Was Bondi's Hearing Closed-Door?
The interview was held behind closed doors as a structural compromise negotiated by House Oversight Committee Chairman James Comer, a Kentucky Republican. Comer offered the transcribed private format as an incentive to secure Bondi's voluntary cooperation after she had resisted a formal public deposition.
The closed-door arrangement has drawn fierce condemnation from committee Democrats, who criticized the decision to bar video recording and immediate public broadcast. The transcript is expected to be released in the coming days.
Maria Farmer, an Epstein survivor, said in a statement shared with Newsweek, “Former Attorney General Pam Bondi’s continued evasion of questions about her grave mishandling of the release of the Epstein files was not surprising — it’s a pattern of behavior. At every turn, Bondi has ignored and disregarded the will of Epstein survivors who have waited for justice for decades and even now, as a private citizen, she refuses responsibility for her missteps and failures. While we welcome Congress’ efforts to continue pushing all those involved in perpetrating our abuse for answers, we demand they use every lever possible, every investigative tool available, and every resource necessary to ensure Bondi, other officials responsible for protecting survivors, and the government itself are held accountable for their long-term failures."
...
Why Was Pam Bondi Fired as Attorney General?
Trump abruptly fired Bondi on April 2, 2026, cutting her turbulent tenure short after roughly 15 months in office. Trump had reportedly grown increasingly frustrated with Bondi's inability to deliver swift federal prosecutions against his prominent political adversaries, an impasse that burst into public view via critical social media posts. Her standing within the West Wing was further crippled by the compounding political fallout from the slow rollout of the Epstein files, leaving the administration exposed to intense bipartisan congressional scrutiny.
When Was Pam Bondi Diagnosed With Thyroid Cancer?
Reports emerged this week revealing that Bondi had been diagnosed with thyroid cancer. The diagnosis was confirmed by White House officials and close political allies, who noted she had recently undergone surgery and a series of subsequent treatments.
Bondi said she is still recovering but “doing well,” sharing the diagnosis just days before she is scheduled to testify before the House Oversight Committee in its probe of the Epstein case.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines