By Professor Aymeric Lim, M.D.
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
At 3 a.m., a junior nurse in a busy ward notices a change in a patient’s breathing. She has two choices: She can wait for the consultant on call, follow the chain of command and protect herself from the discomfort of acting alone; or she can act now — escalate, intervene, reorganize the team around her — because she understands the mission and trusts that the system will back her judgment. In health care, the difference between those two choices is sometimes the difference between life and death.
For most of its modern history, hospital management has favored the first instinct. We have built command-and-control hierarchies that mirror the industrial factory more than the operating theatre. Decisions flow up, permissions flow down and, somewhere in the middle, friction accumulates. Small frictions that, in aggregate, slow the very people we expect to save lives. If we are honest, this model was never designed for the complexity of modern medicine; it was designed for predictability. But health care today is anything but predictable.
At the National University Hospital, Singapore (NUH), we have been quietly importing a leadership philosophy from an unlikely place: the military doctrine of mission command. In its simplest form, mission command says this: leaders set clear intent, define the boundaries and then trust their people to figure out the “how.” Authority is distributed. Accountability is shared. Initiative is expected. It is a philosophy built for environments where the situation changes faster than orders can travel. That description fits a battlefield. It also fits an emergency department on a Saturday night.
Read More on Health
We call our version “Leadership Where We Stand.” It is the foundation of how we are developing leadership at every level of a more than 9,000-strong workforce. A staff nurse leads a resuscitation. A pharmacist redesigns a medication round. A porter spots a safety hazard and stops the line. Each of them is, in that moment, the leader. Our job at the top is not to micromanage their decisions but to ensure they have the training, the information and the psychological permission to make those decisions well.
...
Psychological permission is the one we often underestimate. Empowerment is not a poster on a wall. It is a daily practice of removing friction that tells frontline staff their judgment is not trusted. We have made this commitment literal. On our organizational dashboard, alongside the metrics you would expect, such as patient outcomes, waiting times and staff well-being, there is a small dustbin icon. It is our visual reminder that we have a standing commitment to throw out the rules, processes, forms and approvals that no longer serve our people. We call it our corporate spring-cleaning, and it never ends.
Why does this matter beyond NUH? Because every health system in the world is grappling with the same paradox. Demand is rising. Workforces are shrinking. Burnout is climbing. And the instinctive response of having tighter controls, more standardization and more dashboards often makes things worse, not better. The research is increasingly clear: health care professionals do not leave because the work is hard; they leave because they feel disempowered. They are asked to carry the weight of life-and-death decisions while being denied the authority to shape the conditions in which those decisions are made.
Mission command flips that equation. It says: we will invest in your capability, redesign work so you can practice at the top of your license, and then we will get out of your way. In return, you will own the mission, not as an abstract slogan, but as a concrete responsibility for your patients, your team, and the colleagues who depend on you.
The link to retention is not theoretical. Autonomy is one of the most consistent predictors of health care professionals' engagement, job satisfaction and retention in the published literature. But autonomy without competence is chaos, and competence without psychological safety is silence. The three must be built together. That is why we are investing in leadership development for various levels of our staff. A first-year radiographer needs to know how to lead a difficult conversation. A senior consultant needs to know how to follow one.
There is discipline to this. Mission command is not a license to improvise. It is a contract: The leader is responsible for clarity of intent; the team is responsible for disciplined initiative within that intent. When something goes wrong, and in health care, sometimes it will, the question is not, “who broke the rule?” but, “did we equip our people to make the right judgment, and did we listen when they tried to tell us something was wrong?” That is the question that distinguishes a learning organization from a defensive one.
I do not pretend this is easy. Distributing authority is, in many ways, harder than holding onto it. It requires leaders to tolerate the discomfort of decisions that they did not personally approve. It requires systems built for surveillance to be rebuilt for trust. It requires patience with the messiness of devolved judgment, and faith that, on average, ten thousand well-trained people closer to the patient will make better decisions than ten people in a boardroom.
But the alternative to a more centralized, more controlled, more bureaucratically tidy health system is not actually safer. It is only more legible. And legibility is not the same as resilience. When the next crisis comes, and it will, the hospitals that endure will not be the ones with the most detailed playbooks. They will be the ones whose people, at every level, know the mission, trust each other and have been given the authority to act.
That is the leadership model that health care didn’t know it needed. It is also, I would argue, the one our patients have been waiting for.
Aymeric Lim is a member of the Newsweek CEO Circle, an invite-only executive community of subscribers.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines