10
Loading video...
By Steve Mollman
News Editor
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
Representative Thomas Massie accused fellow Republicans of hypocrisy on Saturday, arguing that congressional lawmakers expressing outrage over a massive migrant surge in the Spanish enclave of Ceuta recently supported language in a committee report that appeared sympathetic to Morocco's position regarding the territory.
The criticism highlights an unexpected intersection between U.S. legislative politics and an international migration crisis. As Republican leaders in Washington, including President Donald Trump and Vice President JD Vance, pointed to images of tens of thousands of migrants entering Ceuta as a warning about weak borders, Massie contended that his colleagues had previously backed committee report language that appeared sympathetic to Morocco's position on Ceuta and Melilla, the two Spanish enclaves on Morocco's Mediterranean coast.
Newsweek reached out to Massie, the State Department, the House Appropriations Committee Republicans, and the Spanish and Moroccan embassies in Washington, DC for comment on Saturday.
Read More on News
The State Department issued a travel advisory raising Ceuta to Level 3 ("Reconsider Travel") on Saturday, and in an X post it described the migrant surge as an "egregious violation" of Spain's sovereignty.
Related Story
Donald Trump Seizes on Spain Migrant Crisis. But Will Voters Listen?
What Massie Said
In a post on X, Massie wrote on Saturday:
"Don't fall for the fake Fox/GOP outrage. Two weeks ago the House passed a bill that greenlighted the transfer of Spanish territory to Morocco. Every Republican except me voted for it, but now THEY are acting shocked at the invasion."
Massie's criticism focused on language contained in the House Appropriations Committee report accompanying the legislation, not on the text of the bill itself.
Massie referenced H.R. 8595, the National Security, Department of State, and Related Programs Appropriations Act, 2027. The Kentucky Republican was the sole GOP lawmaker to vote against the legislation, which passed the House on July 15 in a 217-209 vote. Most Democrats opposed the measure.
On Monday, Massie argued on X that the issue extended beyond the report language itself, noting that the House legislation also included roughly $40 million in funding for Morocco. He contended that the funding and accompanying report language lent credibility to Morocco's claims over Ceuta and Melilla.
What the Documents Actually Say
The report Massie cited states: "The Committee notes that the Spanish-administered cities of Ceuta and Melilla are located in Moroccan territory and remain the subject of Morocco's longstanding claim."
It continues: "The Committee supports efforts by the Secretary of State to encourage diplomatic engagement between Morocco and Spain on the future status of Ceuta and Melilla."
The language appears in the report's section on Morocco rather than in the text of H.R. 8595 itself. It is notable because it describes the Spanish-administered cities as being "located in Moroccan territory," wording that aligns with Morocco's longstanding claim to Ceuta and Melilla. However, committee reports are not legally binding and do not themselves alter sovereignty, transfer territory, or change international borders.
That distinction is central to evaluating Massie's claim that Congress "greenlighted the transfer" of Spanish territory to Morocco.
"GOP Congress voted to give Morocco $40 mil and lent credibility to their claim to Ceuta," he wrote on X. In a follow-up post, Massie added: "The committee report (and final explanatory statement) tells agencies, and signals to everyone else, how Congress really wants the money spent and the programs run."
The posts appeared to address a key criticism of Massie's original argument: that committee reports are not legally binding. Massie argued that such reports nevertheless influence agency actions and signal congressional intent.
Former Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene advanced a similar criticism in a post on X Sunday but made a more expansive argument than Massie by linking the House funding measure directly to the events in Ceuta.
"Republicans paid $40 MILLION of your tax dollars to Morocco to invade Spain," Greene wrote, while arguing that Republicans later condemning the migrant surge were taking inconsistent positions.
Greene's characterization went beyond Massie's criticism, which focused on the bill's funding provisions and accompanying committee report language.
While the report does not endorse transferring sovereignty, it not only describes Ceuta and Melilla as being "located in Moroccan territory" but also expresses support for diplomatic engagement on their "future status," language critics could view as sympathetic to Morocco's position.
...
Why Ceuta Matters
Ceuta, situated on Morocco's Mediterranean coast, is administered by Spain and forms one of the European Union's few land borders with Africa.
The region plunged into crisis after roughly 50,000 migrants crossed into the enclave on Thursday, prompting the deployment of Spanish military units. Juan Jesús Vivas, head of the Ceuta regional government, described the situation as "absolutely unsustainable."
Spanish authorities later reported that the flow had largely reversed, with more than 48,000 migrants returning to Morocco. Officials confirmed that at least 67 people died during the surge, with some drowning and others crushed while attempting to cross.
U.S. and European Reactions
Trump characterized the scenes as "terrible," while Vance called the footage "an unfortunate reminder of the consequences of mass migration." The State Department stated it stood with Spain against an "egregious violation" of sovereignty.
Other conservative figures echoed those concerns. Senator Eric Schmitt and White House deputy chief of staff Stephen Miller argued the events illustrated the dangers of permissive immigration policies. In Europe, Italian Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni similarly pointed to the surge as a threat to continental security.
Related Story
In Pictures: How Wave of Migrants Is Crossing Into Ceuta by Sea
Spain and Morocco's Dispute
The political sensitivity of Ceuta extends far beyond migration since Morocco has never accepted Spanish sovereignty over Ceuta and Melilla and frequently refers to them as occupied territories.
The issue has repeatedly strained relations between Spain and Morocco.
A previous crisis in 2021 saw roughly 8,000 people enter Ceuta after Morocco relaxed border controls amid tensions with Spain over Western Sahara. Although Spain moved closer to Morocco's position on Western Sahara in 2022, disputes over the enclaves have never completely disappeared.
That history makes the committee report language cited by Massie particularly noteworthy.
The debate highlights how congressional report language, while not legally binding, can carry political significance when lawmakers appear to take conflicting positions on the same international dispute.
Contact Newsweek editor for this story: Anthony Murray.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines