10
Loading video...
By Rob Salter
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
Never before have leaders had access to so much knowledge about how to lead. Yet too often, they keep learning instead of acting on what they already know.
For years, we’ve accepted the idea that better leadership begins with closing the knowledge gap. Read another book. Attend another leadership retreat. Enroll in another executive program. Listen to another podcast.
The assumption is simple. The more leaders know, the better they will lead.
Read More on Leadership Insights
That assumption is increasingly difficult to defend. The leadership gap today is often less about what leaders know than whether they are willing to act on what they already understand.
...
Leadership theories, executive education, coaching, podcasts, and business books have become a global industry.
Harvard Business Impact’s 2025 Global Leadership Development Study, based on 1,159 L&D and HR professionals and functional leaders across 14 countries, found that leadership development remains an important organizational priority.
But respondents also identified significant barriers, including insufficient time for learning, difficulty assessing leadership-skill gaps, poor alignment with business strategy and organizational resistance to change.
The study also found that organizations increasingly prioritize practical application, post-program sustainment and measurable business impact when evaluating leadership-development programs.
That disconnect deserves more attention. Organizations can fill executives with knowledge while leaving the behaviors that determine how people actually experience leadership largely unchanged.
Converting Understanding Into Behavior
I have spent much of my career helping leaders learn, grow, and challenge their thinking. When someone genuinely lacks knowledge, education is an intelligent investment.
The problem begins when learning becomes a sophisticated way of postponing action.
I once coached an executive whose appetite for learning was extraordinary. His bookshelves were filled with leadership titles. He followed respected business thinkers closely, and almost every recommendation I offered was something he had already explored.
Yet difficult decisions remained difficult decisions. The knowledge had accumulated, but too little had changed in how he led.
Eventually, I realized his challenge was not understanding leadership. It was converting understanding into behavior.
A Familiar Sight
I now see versions of that problem repeatedly. Leaders postpone difficult conversations because they want another perspective.
They delay strategic decisions until they have completed another programme. They reach for another framework because certainty feels safer than commitment.
Sometimes that is prudent. But preparation can also become fear wearing professional clothing.
Choosing not to act is still a decision. Leave an underperforming executive unchallenged and the team continues living with the consequences.
Allow a failing strategy to drift and resources continue following it. Postpone a necessary conversation, and uncertainty spreads to people who may have no power to resolve it themselves.
The consequences of that gap extend beyond individual leaders. When leadership development works, knowledge becomes visible in better decisions, earlier conversations, and changed behavior.
Effective Leadership
The alternative is more troubling. Leaders become increasingly skilled at diagnosing problems and explaining what should change while the organization itself remains unchanged. Learning begins to resemble progress without producing it.
The difference is execution.
Every leader should therefore ask three questions. What is the most consequential problem I already understand? What action have I taken to address it? If the answer is "not enough," what am I actually waiting for?
In my experience, the answer is often uncertainty, self-doubt, or fear of getting it wrong. I have experienced those feelings too.
Effective leadership does not require eliminating uncertainty. It requires preventing uncertainty from becoming a permanent excuse.
Education as Intellectual Cover
Organizations should apply the same standard to leadership development.
Stop measuring success primarily through attendance, completion, or knowledge acquired. Require every participant to identify one consequential leadership problem, commit to one observable behavioral change, and put a deadline against it.
Thirty days later, ask what happened. What conversation occurred? What decision was made? What behavior changed? What result followed?
None of this argues against learning. Leaders should read, seek coaching, challenge assumptions, and expose themselves to new ideas.
The danger comes when preparation becomes indefinite, and education provides intellectual cover for avoiding execution.
Before buying the next leadership book or enrolling in another programme, identify one action you already know you should take and schedule it within the next 30 days. Then do it before adding another framework to the shelf.
The leadership knowledge gap will never disappear completely. But the more dangerous gap is already within our control. It is the distance between what we know and what we are willing to do.
Rob Salter is the founder of Saltant Ltd, an executive leadership coach and the author of The Action Gap. He previously held senior corporate, managing director and chief executive roles. The views expressed in this article are his own.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines