...
By Sam Stevenson
Associate News Editor
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
Vice President JD Vance leads the early 2028 Republican primary field with 37 percent support in a new national poll of GOP voters and leaners conducted in late April.
The results, which come from Verasight’s 2026 Variety Survey, suggest Vance has consolidated support inside the party more than a year after entering national office.
Other potential contenders remain fragmented, leaving no clear alternative challenger at this stage.
Read More on Politics
The survey also found Vance with the strongest favorability profile in the field, with more than seven in ten Republican voters viewing him positively.
Newsweek has reached out to Vance’s office via a contact form on the White House’s website for comment.
Why It Matters
Early primary polling rarely predicts nominees, but it can reveal how quickly a figure is gaining traction inside their party.
In this case, Vance’s lead points to strong name recognition and favorable impressions among Republican voters as the next presidential cycle begins to take shape.
...
What To Know
Verasight’s national survey was conducted between April 21 and April 23, 2026, with a total sample of 2,000 U.S. adults and a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 2.3 percentage points, accounting for design effects.
The Republican and Republican‑leaning subsample consisted of 802 respondents, and the poll was weighted to match the March 2026 Current Population Survey on standard demographic variables and partisan benchmarks from Pew Research Center surveys and the 2024 vote.
Asked who they would support if the 2028 Republican presidential primary were held today, almost four in ten Republican and Republican‑leaning voters chose Vance.
No other candidate reached 20 percent. Secretary of State Marco Rubio placed second at 16 percent, followed by Donald Trump Jr. at 13 percent. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis trailed at 7 percent, while former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley received 4 percent. And 9 percent said they were unsure.
The rest of the field registered in the low single digits, underscoring the degree to which Republican preferences are currently concentrated around a small number of well‑known figures. Several sitting governors and senators tested in the poll failed to break out of the margin of error.
...
...
...
JD Vance Ahead on Favorability
Favorability data may help explain that advantage. Among Republican respondents, Vance received a combined 71 percent favorable rating, including 46 percent who described their view as “very favorable” and 25 percent as “somewhat favorable.”
Only 15 percent expressed an unfavorable opinion, and just 1 percent said they had never heard of him.
By comparison, Rubio’s overall favorability stood at 63 percent, while Donald Trump Jr. recorded a combined favorable rating of 59 percent, but also a higher unfavorable share, including 11 percent who said they view him very unfavorably.
DeSantis posted a 62 percent favorable rating but showed little primary support, suggesting goodwill without clear electoral momentum. Several other figures tested in the survey suffered from limited name recognition.
Roughly a quarter of Republicans said they had never heard of Senators Josh Hawley or Tom Cotton, while similar shares were unfamiliar with Governors Glenn Youngkin and Sarah Huckabee Sanders.
Haley faced a different challenge: nearly one‑quarter of Republicans viewed her unfavorably, with a sizable group rating her neutrally rather than positively.
Taken together, the results point less to a settled nomination contest than to an uneven playing field. Vance stands out as the only candidate pairing broad familiarity with strong favorability and early vote intent. The rest of the field appears either polarizing, under‑defined, or struggling to translate profile into support.
That combination helps explain why Vance’s lead is sizeable even at this early stage—and why the gap, rather than the raw numbers, may be the most important signal in the data.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines