10

Loading video...

Brendan Cole

By Brendan Cole

Senior Reporter

0

Share

Newsweek is a Trust Project member

See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.


The agreement to end the Iran war has faced criticism for offering Tehran too many concessions while extracting little from the Islamic Republic in return.

President Donald Trump signed a memorandum of understanding (MOU) on Wednesday at the Palace of Versailles in France, saying it would ease the economic turbulence caused by Iran’s blockading of the Strait of Hormuz.

But critics point to it giving Iran too much and leaving unanswered questions over the purpose of the war, which started on February 28 with joint strikes by American and Israeli forces on Iran.

Read More

100 Days of Iran War: Winners and Losers 11 min read

100 Days of Iran War: Winners and Losers

The framework to end sanctions linked to Iran's nuclear program and free up billions in unfrozen funds for Tehran offers “a significant boon for Tehran,” Osamah Khalil, a Middle East expert at Syracuse University, told Newsweek.

More will be hammered out over the next 60 days, but the deal so far has raised questions over the purpose of the 111-day conflict, which has killed at least 2,211 people, including 14 U.S. troops, and cost the U.S. government an estimated $50 billion.

“Washington seems to have paid in advance for promises that still need to be negotiated, verified and enforced,” Aurélien Colson, the academic co-director of the ESSEC Business School Institute for Geopolitics & Business, told Newsweek on Thursday. “That is always dangerous, but especially so with Iran.”

U.S. President Donald Trump signs a framework agreement to end the Iran war next to French President Emmanuel Macron at the Palace of Versailles on June 17, 2026.

...

What The Deal Does

Trump said the agreement would immediately reopen the Strait of Hormuz, which Tehran had in essence blockaded for three months, upending global energy markets. But there is a lack of clarity about how it addresses Iran’s control of the critical waterway through which one-fifth of the world’s energy transits.

Iran has charged a toll for ships to use the waterway, and even if maritime traffic were restored, messaging from Tehran indicates it will not relinquish control. The framework would waive passage charges through the strait for 60 days, but what happens afterward is unclear.

The Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC)-affiliated Fars News reported that changes to an earlier deal included references to a joint Iranian-Omani administration of the waterway. Iranian officials have signaled that Tehran would keep control over the strait and that vessels transiting it should pay service fees in the future, presenting a scenario worse than before February 28.

The agreement would also see the U.S. terminate all types of sanctions, make available frozen or restricted funds and assets and end the American naval blockade of Iran’s ports, which has hit the Islamic Republic’s critical exports hard.

This would provide vital funds for the sanctions-hit economy. State news outlet Mehr reported on Tuesday that Tehran would soon gain access to part of its frozen assets, have its oil sanctions suspended, and gain free access to oil revenue. This could see Iran earn up to $10 billion from 60 days of oil sales, with total revenue during this period exceeding $30 billion, according to Mehr.

Khalil from Syracuse University said Iran “will be able to conduct unhindered trade globally and invite investments into the country," adding that, "without the shadow of the nuclear program and U.S. regime change efforts, there should also be a significant reduction in regional tensions."

Meanwhile, the deal would also see the U.S. work with regional partners to develop a plan with at least $300 billion for Iran’s reconstruction and economic development, although there is no commitment for U.S. funds.

This prospect has been criticized.

In an op-ed for the Times of Israel, David Horovitz wrote this: “will doubtless utilize to help keep its restive population in line, to massively fund Hezbollah, Hamas and its other terrorist proxies, and to spend as needed on its nuclear and ballistic missile programs.”

In its assessment on Wednesday, the Institute for the Study of War (ISW) said Iran will likely use renewed economic access to reconstitute the Axis of Resistance of regional proxies, particularly Hezbollah in Lebanon, during the 60-day negotiation period.

“Iran has already told Hezbollah that Iran will increase its funding as soon as possible once the United States unfreezes Iranian assets,” the Washington, D.C.-based think tank said.

Colson said: “From a negotiation perspective, this is not sequencing: it is front-loading concessions. While a proper interim agreement should buy time while preserving pressure, this one appears to buy time by spending most of the pressure upfront.“

What The Deal Doesn’t Do

Trump entered the war with Iran with maximalist goals like eliminating its nuclear program, destroying its ballistic missile program and ending its support for regional proxies such as Hezbollah and Hamas. While Trump has said that Iran’s nuclear capabilities have been depleted, reaching these aims has not been categorically addressed in the framework deal.

Iran will not be able to procure or develop nuclear weapons under the deal, and both sides would agree to discuss Tehran’s stockpile of highly enriched uranium, which Washington says can be made into a nuclear weapon.

But the fate of what Trump calls “nuclear dust” will rest for the second-phase talks over the next 60 days.

Tehran has been successful in separating the nuclear question from the 60-day negotiation period, Manuel Herrera, from the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT) Monitor project at the security think tank BASIC, told Newsweek.

“This is quite skillful because this gives them leverage and time to address their main priorities regarding the nuclear file,” he said.

Lebanon

The deal also affirms Lebanon’s territorial integrity in the face of Israel’s invasion against the Hezbollah group, which entered the war when it fired rockets into northern Israel on March 2 in sympathy with Iran, its main backer.

But the Israel Defense Forces (IDF) said Thursday it would continue operating in southern Lebanon in the territory it has occupied since the start of the war. Israel has conducted a bombing campaign across Lebanon and invaded a significant part of the country's south.

More than 3,800 people have been killed in Lebanon, according to the country's health ministry, while Israeli authorities say 30 soldiers and four civilians have been killed on both sides of the border. Over one million people have been displaced, and the fate of Lebanon is a tricky obstacle to lasting peace.

“The real risk is that this MoU produces a pause rather than a settlement,” said Colson. “Iran gains relief, the U.S. trumpets diplomatic success, Israel contests the Lebanon provisions, but the hard questions are pushed into a 60-day framework that may not be strong enough to carry them.”

Vessels are seen anchored in Bandar Abbas along the Strait of Hormuz on June 18, 2026.

...

Full Text of the 14-Point Draft Agreement

Islamabad Memorandum of Understanding between the United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran. The United States of America and the Islamic Republic of Iran has jointly agreed in good faith on the following:

View 0 Comments

Request Reprint & Licensing

Submit Correction

View Editorial & AI Guidelines