By Professor Aymeric Lim, M.D.
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
The most expensive mistake a health system can make is also the most common one: building the hospital of the future and staffing it with the workforce of the past. New beds, old workflows. New scanners, old roles. New towers of glass and concrete, designed around assumptions about how care is delivered, will be obsolete before the ribbon is cut. We have all seen this movie. It does not end well for patients, and it does not end well for the public wallet.
As we plan the 2038 redevelopment of the National University Hospital, Singapore (NUH), we have made a deliberate decision: physical infrastructure and workforce transformation will be designed as a single integrated system – not in parallel, not in sequence, but as one. Our redevelopment is not just bricks. It is a manpower philosophy expressed in steel, glass, and silicon.
The case for doing this differently is not aesthetic; it is arithmetic. Singapore, like most advanced economies, is heading into a triple challenge: an ageing population, a shrinking workforce and rising costs. The traditional response to rising demand has been to expand capacity by building more beds, more clinics and more buildings. But capacity expansion without productivity redesign is, in plain language, irresponsible. It commits future generations of staff to run harder on a treadmill that is already speeding up. It locks in cost structures that the country cannot afford. And it almost guarantees that the workforce we have already stretched will burn out before the new building is fully operational.
Read More on Community Forum
So, we are starting in a different place. Before we draw a single corridor, we are asking what work will look like in 2038. What will a nurse spend her day doing, and what will be done by an AI agent, a robot or a redesigned process? Which clinical decisions will still require a consultant on site, and which can be safely supported by a multidisciplinary team operating at the top of its license? Which patient journeys belong in a hospital at all, and which belong in a home, a community clinic or a virtual ward? Each of those questions has architectural consequences. The building follows the work, not the other way round.
To do this properly, we have established a Strategic Workforce Taskforce. Its remit is unglamorous but indispensable: manpower benchmarking, departmental baselines and oversight of the pilots we are running across the hospital to test new ways of working. Some of those pilots will scale. Some will quietly fail. Both outcomes are useful. What is not acceptable is to design a new hospital based on the workforce assumptions of the current one because that workforce, in its current shape, will not exist in 2038.
This requires a shift in leadership mindset that I do not think we talk about enough. Most health care leaders are, by training and instinct, very good at managing current operations. We are paid to run the hospital we have. But the redevelopment asks us to do something different: to architect future possibilities. To make decisions whose payoff is fifteen years away, with capital we will spend today on behalf of patients and staff, most of whom we have not yet met. That is a different cognitive discipline, and it must be cultivated deliberately.
Productivity, in this context, is not a polite word for doing more with less. It is a serious commitment to redesign work so that every member of staff spends more of their time on what they are uniquely trained to do, and less on what they should never have been doing in the first place. It is a clinical leadership commitment as much as a managerial one. And it is the only honest answer to a workforce that is shrinking even as demand is rising.
We are also designing sustainability and cost containment as first-order requirements, not afterthoughts. A building that wins a sustainability award on day one and then runs an unsustainable cost base for fifty years is not a sustainable building. Energy-optimized systems, smart building management, green roofs and vertical greenery, solar generation: all of these matter, but they matter most because they shape the operating economics of the institution for decades to come. The right environmental decisions and the right financial decisions, on a long enough horizon, are usually the same decisions.
There is a particular responsibility that comes with being a university hospital. We are not just a place where care is delivered. We are a living laboratory for how care could be delivered, and what we learn here is supposed to spread. That is a privilege and an obligation. It means we must take more risks on workforce models, technology adoption and care pathway redesign than a hospital without our research and teaching mission could responsibly take. And it means we must be unusually disciplined about evaluating those experiments and sharing the results, including the failures.
Finally, a word about the human-centered part. It is easy, when designing a hospital, to be seduced by technology. Robots in corridors, sensors in walls, algorithms in everything; all of that has a role. But the people who will use this building – patients, families, staff – are not, fundamentally, asking for a more high-tech experience. They are asking for a more humane one. They want to be seen. They want to feel safe. They want care that respects their time and their dignity. The best technology is the kind they barely notice, because it is quietly making the human encounter at the center of health care more possible.
If we get the 2038 redevelopment right, the most striking thing about it will not be the architecture. It will be that, somehow, the place feels calmer than it should – clinicians have time to talk, patients feel held and the building works for the people inside it, instead of the other way round. That is a workforce achievement before it is a construction achievement. We will not get there by building first and hoping the workforce catches up. We will get there by designing both together, from the very first sketch.
Aymeric Lim is a member of the Newsweek CEO Circle, an invite-only executive community of subscribers.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines