...
By Newsweek Editors
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
The photos landed almost simultaneously. They produced a familiar—and to many, tiresome by now—jolt of online outrage.
One showed “DoorDash Grandma” delivering fast food to the White House in a made-for-virality stunt to promote Donald Trump’s “no tax on tips” policy.
Another captured Guy Fieri greeting Andrew and Tristan Tate at a UFC event, manosphere figures whose notoriety has become shorthand for a certain bleak corner of the internet.
Read More on Analysis
In both cases, critics demanded contrition. Yet only one apology came.
A “devastated” Fieri swiftly disavowed the encounter and insisted he did not share the Tates’ views or even know about them.
DoorDash, by contrast, absorbed the criticism, and its public affairs team openly argued back in a pugilistic show of defiance against those calling them out on social media.
The split reaction reveals a key dynamic that still keeps “cancel culture” a potent force in the U.S. even after it was declared dead by conservatives in the second Trump era.
The Fragility of a Personal Brand
Guy Fieri’s brand rests on a carefully cultivated universality.
As the exuberant host who celebrates diners, drive-ins, and dives, Fieri occupies a space deliberately distant from the ideological wars tearing through the U.S.
Fieri may be the self-declared “Mayor of Flavortown,” but his appeal is not political or even aspirational. It is deliberately populist, genial, and broadly American.
He’s just a fun-loving guy who doesn't take himself too seriously as he enthusiastically tours the country’s humble mom-and-pop diners.
That neutrality is no accident. It’s a major asset that allows Fieri to function as a cultural common denominator to all Americans. Who doesn’t love the Mayor of Flavortown, literally or ironically?
Fieri is recognizable, nonthreatening, and largely immune to the type of reductive partisan sorting that so much of American discourse has devolved into.
That is precisely why the images with the Tate brothers, so reviled by so many despite their legion of slavish followers, cut sharply.
Whatever Fieri’s intentions or awareness, the association collided with the essence of his public persona.
The Tates are deeply polarizing figures whose reputations are inseparable from political and cultural grievance. To appear alongside them was to invite an inference—fair or not—that Fieri was choosing sides in a culture war he has spent his career avoiding.
For a celebrity whose commercial value depends on mass likability, that inference is dangerous.
By moving quickly to distance himself, Fieri reinforced the boundaries of his brand and reassured audiences that the encounter was incidental, not expressive.
“I’m seeing all of your comments about the photo from Saturday’s UFC event and all I can say is that I’m devastated,” Fieri posted to X.
“I was there to see the fights and when I was walking through the venue, the Tate brothers stood up and said hello and that’s when the exchanged happened. I did not know them or about them before that moment.
“I’ll never pretend to be a perfect person but let me be crystal clear, I do not know the Tate brothers nor do I support them in any way.”
The apology was not simply a moral gesture. It was an urgent strategic correction.
Why DoorDash Can Afford Defiance
DoorDash occupies a very different position to Fieri.
Its value is not personality but infrastructure, a convenience layer embedded in daily life. The proposition is simple efficiency: speed, choice, and ease. And people are buying into it, no matter what they say.
Unlike a celebrity, DoorDash does not need to trade on warmth or moral identification, no matter what brand marketers like to say. It trades on utility, which is why DoorDash did not rush to apologize after its White House delivery stunt drew criticism.
For most ordinary customers, the cold truth is that political signaling—whether perceived or real—barely registers against the immediate benefit of having food arrive quickly. The market never lies.
The gap between online outrage and consumer behavior is wide, and DoorDash’s leadership appears to understand that. Calls for boycotts only carry weight when they plausibly threaten revenue.
In this case, the overlap between those angry enough to swear off DoorDash and those who regularly rely on it is likely small, even if they’re loud about it on social media.
Anyone sufficiently motivated to avoid the platform on political grounds, such as objections to the gig economy, probably already does. For everyone else, convenience wins out.
More telling was the company’s willingness to engage critics rather than retreat into shamed silence. DoorDash’s public affairs head came out swinging, telling one critic to “touch grass”.
It screams of confidence, not panic. Engagement keeps the company at the center of the conversation and extends the lifespan of the stunt itself. In a crowded market, attention is everything. If nobody’s talking about you, nobody cares about you.
DoorDash’s calculation seems to be that any reputational noise will dissipate long before it affects ordering habits.
People will get bored, they’ll get hungry, and, with the tap of their thumbs, they’ll order something to eat.
Cancel Culture After Its Peak
These episodes reflect a bigger shift on cancel culture in the Trump era.
The period when public outrage reliably produced capitulation is gone. Years of boycotts, pile-ons, and online campaigns have dulled their own force, and opponents of this style of activist politics have broadly won the day.
Audiences are fatigued by cancel culture, and companies have learned to differentiate between noise and signal.
Recent history is full of attempted cancellations that failed to translate into material consequences. Streaming services, consumer brands, and even individual creators have weathered repeated calls for boycotts with little long-term damage.
In some cases, defiance has become a form of high-value signaling in its own right, a proof of authenticity or independence.
At the same time, the politics of transgression have shifted. What once risked professional exile can now function as currency. Edginess and anti-wokeism are no longer fringe, they are mainstream enough to be boring, even passé.
Outrage, in turn, has become more selective. It concentrates where leverage exists and dissipates where it does not.
The New Rules
The contrast between DoorDash and Fieri underscores a narrower, sharper reality.
Cancel culture has not disappeared; it has become situational.
Its effectiveness depends a lot less on the intensity of criticism than before. Previously, the sheer volume of outrage was enough to compel penance. Now, it depends mostly on the vulnerability of the target to the material effects of that criticism.
Individuals whose livelihoods hinge on broad affection are among the most still exposed to the dangers of cancellation. Their brands are personal, and personal brands are brittle. A single image can puncture years of careful positioning.
For them, apology is often the least costly option.
Large companies built on habit and convenience face a different calculus. Their scale, diversification, and embeddedness insulate them from episodic backlash. Unless outrage aligns with a customer’s immediate self-interest—or with regulatory risk—it rarely forces a retreat.
Outrage is a flamethrower. But it is a tool that works only when turned against material that can burn. In the current culture wars, the question for people like Guy Fieri is this: Am I flammable?
Hey gang, Carlo Versano here. I hope you enjoyed this article. As Newsweek's Director of Politics and Culture and editor of the 1600 newsletter, I'm keen to hear what you think. Now, Newsweek is offering a new service to allow you to communicate directly with me in the form of a text message chat. You can sign up and get a direct line to me, as well as the reporters who work for me. You can shape our coverage.
As a Newsweek member, we're offering this service to you for free. You can sign up below, or read more about how it works here. Let's talk!
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines