...
By Newsweek Editors
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
Ronald Reagan liked allies who agreed with him just 80 percent of the time; Abraham Lincoln preferred rivals who disagreed with him most of the time—and put three of them in his Cabinet. Barack Obama, nodding to Doris Kearns Goodwin’s Team of Rivals, made his 2008 primary opponent Hillary Clinton his secretary of state, a sign of managed friction in the Situation Room. That tradition—inviting argument to sharpen judgment—used to be engrained in American politics.
This week, Donald Trump made the opposite point in 200 words. In a Truth Social post after Rob Reiner’s killing, the president called the director “tortured and struggling” and suggested that he died because of an “incurable affliction” he labeled “TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME,” later telling reporters, “I wasn’t a fan of his at all.” The post drew swift rebukes from across the aisle.
This was not merely a breach of taste. It says something else. Reiner is, as far as onomasticians can deduce, a Germanic-origin name built from ragin (counsel) and heri (army)—literally “counsel of the army.” Yet, in Year One of Trump 2.0 there have been no Cabinet firings—an engineered calm that means fewer Reiners in the room, and fewer chances to say “don’t” before the president hits post.
Read More on News
In 2025 Washington, counsel in the ranks is in short supply.
Common Knowledge
Trump framed Reiner’s death as “reportedly due to the anger he caused others through his massive, unyielding and incurable affliction…known as TRUMP DERANGEMENT SYNDROME,” before reiterating he “wasn’t a fan.”
The reaction was uniform outrage. Democratic strategist David Axelrod called it “perverse” and “revealing,” while entertainment press contrasted Trump’s post to numerous Hollywood tributes.
The right did not rally around him either. “This is inappropriate and disrespectful discourse about a man who was just brutally murdered,” said Republican Representative Thomas Massie. “This is a family tragedy, not about politics,” said Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, a Trump loyalist turned critic.
Uncommon Knowledge
Trump’s first term broke modern records for leadership churn; his second has so far produced no Cabinet firings—the “You’re fired!” persona turned inside out. The administration is optimized for alignment, not argument.
Brookings’s long-running tracker found record-setting “A-team” turnover in Trump’s first term—92 percent of the top 65 West Wing roles saw the first incumbent depart by January 2021, a rate far above any president since the series began in 1981. By July 2019, Alexander Acosta’s resignation as labor secretary marked the ninth Cabinet departure, already more than Reagan, Clinton, George W. Bush or Obama logged in their entire first terms. The period saw not only nine of 15 Cabinet posts changing hands but dozens of high-profile exits beyond the Cabinet.
A year into Trump 2.0, there has been calm in the composition of the Cabinet despite repeated controversies. CNN reported that aides are only preparing for changes only into the second year, thought the White House denied the report. Former national security adviser John Bolton has described the second term’s approach to key personnel as a tilt toward “yes men and yes women,” and not just loyalty but “fealty.”
The question isn’t merely, “Was Trump’s post about Reiner indecent?” It’s, “What does it reveal about a presidency that has traded internal dissent for external backlash?”
Research by psychologists such as Charlan Nemeth shows that consistent minority viewpoints—dissenters who won’t shut up—force groups to widen their frame and improve decision quality, even when the dissenters are actually wrong. By contrast, Irving Janis’s classic “groupthink” model shows that pressures for unanimity and insulated leadership lead to errors. Nobody runs randomized trials on Oval Office deliberations. But a loyalist Cabinet mirrors those conditions. A White House proud of not firing its generals may have, in effect, retired its Reiners.
The question for 2026 isn’t whether Trump will change his tone. It’s whether there is anyone willing to try to make him.
If you’re enjoying Uncommon Knowledge, please share. If you have suggestions for future editions or feedback, email subscriber.feedback@newsweek.com. We want to hear your voice.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines