...
By Anna Rahmanan
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
President Donald Trump's Election Day pledge to end nearly $4 billion in annual aid to Israel looks like a last-minute attempt to neutralize an issue that threatens to cost Republicans votes, including among MAGA conservatives increasingly skeptical of American spending overseas.
Trump made the political calculation explicit in remarks to Fox News' Fox & Friends on Tuesday, singling out Michigan Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed, who has campaigned against American military funding for Israel.
"Because they don't need it, and because why should we suffer the slings from a lunatic like an El-Sayed when they don't need it?" Trump said of the decision to end the aid. "It's a bad talking point, because then you say, why don't we give everybody $4 billion? Israel's our number one, we give them more than anybody else, and they no longer need it."
Read More on Analysis
His remarks suggest that the announcement is driven at least partly by electoral concerns. Trump is openly acknowledging that continued funding for Israel gives Democrats a potent argument against Republicans, while his proposed cutoff could also appeal to America First conservatives who question why Washington spends billions overseas.
El-Sayed, who is challenging Republican Mike Rogers, has linked foreign military spending to domestic affordability, arguing that American taxpayers' money should instead support priorities at home.
Related Story
The US Takes a Deep Breath Before the Post-Midterms Plunge Into Chaos
Related Story
“I Have Felt Politically Homeless”: Michigan Jews Face Senate Dilemma
Related Story
John Cornyn Pulled a Quiet Haley Stevens Switcheroo in Texas
"I don't think we should be funding foreign militaries generally," El-Sayed said. "That's Israel. It's also Egypt. It's also Saudi Arabia and Qatar and (United Arab Emirates)."
His argument, and its timing, create an unusual political overlap between progressive Democrats and parts of the MAGA right, where opposition to foreign military commitments has long been a feature of America First politics.
It's not just a Michigan thing, either, as illustrated by the statistics. A June Quinnipiac poll found 48 percent of voters believed Washington was too supportive of Israel, including 55 percent of independents and 20 percent of Republicans.
Yet 69 percent of Republicans considered U.S. support appropriate, illustrating the competing pressures Trump faces within his own coalition.
There are also questions about whether his promise can be delivered. The existing $3.8 billion annual military aid agreement runs through 2028, and Trump has yet to explain how payments would end two years early.
For now, the political significance is clearer than the policy details. Trump has explicitly identified Israel funding as an argument Democrats can use against Republicans and offered skeptical voters a reason to reconsider their objections.
Voting is already underway today and we've yet to see whether the last-minute promise can change minds quickly enough to make a difference.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines