...
By Suzanne Blake
Reporter
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
Millions of current and former YouTube TV and DirecTV Stream subscribers could be eligible for a cash payout after The Walt Disney Company agreed to a $50 million settlement in a class action lawsuit alleging it drove up streaming prices.
The deal resolves claims that Disney forced streaming platforms to carry expensive channels by bundling them into base packages, which plaintiffs allege led to higher subscription costs for consumers.
Disney has denied wrongdoing but agreed to settle the case.
Read More on Business
Why It Matters
The settlement could impact a broad swath of U.S. consumers who paid for live TV streaming services over the past several years, with specific eligibility spanning customers across nearly seven years.
Disney’s alleged practices limited competition and prevented platforms from offering cheaper alternatives, which regulators and courts are increasingly examining across the entertainment and streaming industries.
...
What To Know
- Disney agreed to pay $50 million into a settlement fund.
- The lawsuit alleges the company inflated streaming prices for services such as YouTube TV and DirecTV Stream.
- Eligible consumers must submit a claim form to receive payment.
- The deadline to file a claim is September 8, 2026.
- Payments will be distributed on a pro-rata basis, meaning the amount varies depending on subscription length and the number of claims filed.
What is the Disney Settlement?
The settlement stems from a federal antitrust class action lawsuit, Biddle et al. v. The Walt Disney Company, which was filed by subscribers of YouTube TV and DirecTV Stream.
Plaintiffs alleged that Disney used its leverage over must-have programming, particularly ESPN, to require streaming services to include those channels in their base packages. According to the complaint, this prevented platforms from offering cheaper bundles, ultimately raising prices for consumers.
Disney has denied the allegations and maintains it did not violate the law, but agreed to the $50 million settlement to avoid prolonged litigation.
Newsweek reached out to the companies for comment via email.
Who is Eligible for the Settlement?
Eligibility for the settlement includes:
- Anyone who subscribed to YouTube TV between April 1, 2019, and March 31, 2026
- Anyone who subscribed to DirecTV Stream (including DirecTV Now or AT&T TV Now) during the same period
Consumers do not need to be current subscribers to qualify, and even canceled accounts may be eligible.
“It's important for those customers to understand you do have to submit a claim by September 8 and the amount you receive will depend on the length of your subscription,” Alex Beene, a financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek.
To receive payment, eligible users must file a claim either online or by mail. In most cases, claimants will self-certify their subscription history rather than provide documentation.
The settlement divides claimants into different categories depending on where they lived during the subscription period, which may affect how funds are distributed.
When Will Payment Be Issued to Subscribers?
Payments are not immediate.
A final approval hearing is scheduled for January 14, 2027, when a judge will decide whether to approve the settlement.
If approved, payments will be issued after that date, with the exact timing depending on court approval and claims processing.
The amount each subscriber receives will depend on how long they subscribed, where they lived and how many valid claims are submitted overall.
What Happens Next
For now, customers need to decide whether to file a claim before the September deadline.
After the claim window closes, the court will review the settlement and any objections. If approved, administrators will calculate individual payouts and begin distributing funds.
“The era of streaming has provided an incredible amount of content for consumers, but it's also produced increased concerns over streaming providers using tactics that could hurt competition,” Beene said.
“This case could serve as a warning that attempts to raise prices on partner providers could not just backfire with customers, but also result in legal backlash, as well.”
Contact Newsweek editors on this story: Kate Nalepinski and Gray R. Thomas
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines