10
Loading video...
By Rich Percival
Associate News Editor
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
Canadians say they are facing questions about their romantic relationships at the U.S. border, with some claiming they have been refused entry while attempting to visit American partners.
One woman claims U.S. border guards turned her away after just three weekend trips to see her boyfriend this year—and warned she could face a five-year ban unless she obtained a fiancé visa, despite the couple not being engaged.
"They told me if I tried to enter again without a K1 visa I would be barred for 5 years," she wrote in a November 1 Reddit discussion about Canadians being denied entry to the United States. "Mind you were not even engaged," she added.
Read More on News
The woman said she had brought documents showing she lived in Canada, but officers still refused her entry. She also claimed they demanded a return airline ticket, despite her travelling by car.
Other Canadians have described being questioned or turned away while visiting American partners, raising questions about how U.S. immigration rules are being enforced.
The accounts, which have not been independently verified, come amid wider concerns about border enforcement under President Donald Trump, including fears that political comments posted online could affect Canadians' ability to enter the country.
Canadians Describe Border Ordeals
In the November 1 discussion, another Canadian student said she had been refused entry once after making approximately eight trips over 18 months, with visits lasting between one and three weeks.
"I was once advised by a border agent to not tell them I was visiting a boyfriend, just say 'friend,'" she claimed.
In a separate case previously reported by TheTravel, another Canadian woman described being refused entry after repeatedly spending three months with her American boyfriend before returning to Canada for just two or three weeks.
"I see him for 3 months and go back home for 2-3 weeks," she wrote. "Now was my third time going, and the U.S. borders wouldn't allow me, when I've been following the rules."
Meanwhile, the woman who started the November discussion said she had spent approximately 120 days in the United States this year visiting her American boyfriend.
...
"I have a full-time job, live in Canada, and have never overstayed or been denied entry," she wrote.
She said officers questioned her extensively during a September crossing, although she was ultimately admitted.
"My most recent entry was completely uneventful, but I still can't shake the worry that one day I'll be turned away simply for visiting too often," she added.
With another three-and-a-half-week trip approaching, she said she was becoming "increasingly nervous" about returning to the United States.
The individual accounts have not been independently verified, and the reasons recorded by American authorities for the reported refusals remain unknown.
Can Canadians Visit American Partners Without a Visa?
Canadian citizens generally do not need visas for short visits to the United States, including trips to see romantic partners, according to US State Department guidance.
Under Section 41.2 of Title 22 of the Code of Federal Regulations, "a visa is not required for other Canadian citizens" except those seeking admission under certain immigration categories.
A K-1 visa is intended for foreign nationals planning to marry American citizens, rather than people simply visiting a boyfriend or girlfriend.
The Immigration and Nationality Act defines the category as applying to someone intending to enter the United States "solely to conclude a valid marriage with the petitioner within ninety days after admission."
There is no general requirement for Canadians to obtain a fiancé visa simply because they are dating an American, or even because they are engaged, provided they qualify as temporary visitors.
...
However, American border officers can refuse admission if they believe someone intends to settle in the United States rather than make a temporary visit.
Under Section 214(b) of the Immigration and Nationality Act, most foreign visitors are presumed to be intending immigrants until they establish their eligibility for temporary admission.
Repeated lengthy stays, limited ties to Canada or evidence of plans to settle permanently could therefore trigger additional questioning, even if a traveller has previously entered without difficulty.
A five-year exclusion can follow certain formal removal orders, but it is not an automatic consequence of being refused entry or travelling without a fiancé visa.
It remains unclear whether the woman who reported being threatened with a five-year ban received a formal removal order or was warned about the consequences of attempting to enter again.
Canadian Questioned Over Trump Facebook Comment
Concerns about entering the United States have also surfaced in a separate case involving a Canadian man questioned by police over an alleged Facebook comment about President Donald Trump.
Alex O'Driscoll, a dog groomer from St. John's, Newfoundland, said he returned home on October 30 to find a Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) investigator's business card taped to his door.
When O'Driscoll contacted the officer, he learned that the U.S. Secret Service had reportedly flagged a comment from a Facebook account he had deleted roughly 18 months earlier.
The alleged post suggested shooting Trump if the president attempted to invade Canada.
But O'Driscoll said he could not remember writing the comment and was not shown evidence of the post.
"I asked for the proof; they said they didn't have it," he told Radio-Canada.
He met an RCMP investigator on November 2 and said the officer concluded he posed no threat. However, he claimed he was warned that the incident could result in a permanent ban from entering the United States.
"I'm not a threat," O'Driscoll said. "Zero, zilch, zip."
...
O'Driscoll was not arrested or charged, and there is no confirmation that American authorities have imposed any travel restrictions against him.
In a statement to Newsweek, a U.S. Secret Service spokesperson said: "The U.S. Secret Service investigates all threats directed at our protectees. Out of concern for operational security, we do not discuss matters of protective intelligence."
The agency did not confirm whether it had identified O'Driscoll's alleged Facebook comment or requested an investigation by Canadian authorities.
The RCMP also told Newsweek: "The security environment in which public figures operate is constantly evolving, and the RCMP takes all threats against public officials seriously."
The force said its responsibilities included investigating threats within its jurisdiction and cooperating with foreign law enforcement agencies, but it would not generally confirm or deny individual investigations.
Neither agency confirmed whether information about O'Driscoll had been shared with U.S. immigration authorities or whether he had been placed on any list that could affect future travel.
Experts Warn of Growing Border Anxiety
Richard Moon, a University of Windsor professor emeritus, questioned whether O'Driscoll's alleged remark amounted to a genuine threat.
"The notion that they're going to interpret that as a kind of direct and immediate threat to Donald Trump is kind of crazy," he told Newsweek.
Moon said American authorities could still refuse entry even if the Canadian had not been charged with an offence.
"The reality is a non-citizen has no right to enter into the United States," he said. "And, you know, free speech interests do not override that."
He suggested that the Secret Service's decision to involve Canadian police could have consequences for O'Driscoll's future travel.
"If they thought enough to follow up on this and to contact the RCMP and ask them to look into it, that just suggests that he's now red-flagged in some way and will likely not be permitted to enter."
James L. Turk, director of the Centre for Free Expression at Toronto Metropolitan University, said the case reflected a much broader concern among Canadians.
...
"There's a real fear amongst Canadians about crossing the border," he told Newsweek.
Turk said some travellers worried that American officers could examine their phones and discover comments criticising Trump or his policies.
He described fears that refusing to provide access to a device could lead to denied entry, while complying might expose political opinions that could also cause difficulties.
Turk said he suspected refusals over political comments were infrequent, but believed the possibility alone was discouraging some Canadians from travelling south.
"People have had colourful descriptions of Trump and his policies or MAGA and their objections to some of the things they're doing, and they're quite fearful," he said. He warned that the uncertainty could discourage Canadians from expressing political opinions, even when those comments were lawful.
"It really is harmful to the rights to freedom of expression that are guaranteed in both the United States and Canada if people are afraid to exercise those rights," Turk said.
US Customs and Border Protection (CBP) has been approached by Newsweek for comment. However, a spokesperson previously told TheTravel on one account: "CBP officers make admissibility determinations on a case-by-case basis considering various circumstances, including the purpose of the visit and the traveler's intent to depart, and using law enforcement, national security, and immigration information available at the time of inspection."
Contact Newsweek editor on this story: Edward Pearcey.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines