Toronto skyline with railroad at riverdale park in Ontario, Canada - stock photo

...

Sam Stevenson

By Sam Stevenson

Associate News Editor

0

Share

Newsweek is a Trust Project member

See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.


Canada's proposed high‑speed rail project is facing growing resistance in rural Ontario and Quebec, with residents warning it could upend daily life, livelihoods and communities.

Newsweek has contacted Transport Canada for comment via email.

A Transport Canada spokesperson previously told Newsweek that the government sees high‑speed rail as a "generational nation‑building project," with the goal of cutting travel times, boosting tourism and driving long‑term economic growth across the Toronto–Quebec City corridor.

Read More on News

The spokesperson said the Ottawa–Montreal segment is designed to build momentum early, with the project expected to add up to $35 billion to gross domestic product and create tens of thousands of construction jobs.

Why It Matters

The federal government bills the project as a transformative infrastructure upgrade, but opposition from rural communities is intensifying as route planning advances, CTV News reported.

Critics say the concerns raise broader questions about land use, property rights and how large national projects affect smaller communities.

Toronto skyline with railroad at riverdale park in Ontario, Canada - stock photo

...

What To Know

A proposed high‑speed rail line connecting major population centers in Ontario and Quebec has begun to encounter sustained resistance from residents living along potential corridors, according to CTV News.

The project is overseen by Alto, a federal Crown corporation tasked with developing the rail system, formerly known as the High-Frequency Rail project.

Construction on the first phase of the 1,000‑kilometer rail line is slated to begin in 2029 or 2030, connecting Montreal and Ottawa as an early test in Canada's most densely populated region.

As consultations continue, rural residents say the line could cut through farms, homes and small businesses, creating long‑term disruptions that outweigh the promised benefits.

Stephane Alary, a regional president of Quebec's farmers union, said rail lines dividing farmland could require farmers to travel several kilometers to reach their own fields, describing the project as a "catastrophe" in the making.

Concerns raised by residents include the possible expropriation of land, blocked or lengthened travel routes, and the impact on emergency services and school transportation, according to CTV News.

Several residents told the outlet they were shocked to learn how close the proposed rail corridor could come to their properties.

"It's just going to roar right through the countryside and destroy it and bisect communities," business owner Gord Boulton told CTV News. He has launched a Facebook group called Save South Frontenac, the township where he lives.

In eastern Ontario communities such as Madoc, residents warned that everyday travel could become more complicated if roads are severed or rerouted by the rail line, CTV News reported.

Others said the project risks permanently altering rural landscapes and local economies that depend on tourism, farming or small‑scale businesses.

Alto has acknowledged that land acquisition remains a sensitive issue, particularly in rural areas where properties are large and often central to family livelihoods.

The corporation has said it is still in an engagement phase and weighing options as opposition mounts.

The backlash reflects a wider debate in Canada over how major infrastructure projects are planned and approved, especially when national priorities clash with local impacts.

What People Are Saying

A spokesperson for Transport Canada previously told Newsweek: "Building Canada's first High-Speed Rail network is a generational nation-building project that will turbocharge the economy, create well-paying jobs, and deliver the world-class transportation system Canadians deserve.

"The Ottawa–Montreal segment leverages a shorter route, enabling simultaneous mobilization in two provinces and building expertise and momentum for rapid expansion across the Corridor.

"High-Speed Rail will connect economic hubs at rapid speeds, boost tourism, cut travel times in half, and spur affordable housing development across the Toronto–Quebec City corridor.

"This High-Speed Rail project will boost GDP by up to $35 billion, could create 51,000 jobs during construction, and unlock enhanced productivity for generations of Canadians."

Alto CEO Martin Imbleau told reporters in January: "Expropriation is a loaded word, because it's frustrating. Hopefully it's not going to be a tool that is the predominant one."

Caroline Stephenson, a Madoc resident, told CTV News: "The school bus that picks up my neighbor's kids is going to be longer. Every single movement that we make is going to be more difficult."

Local business owner Gord Boulton told the outlet: "It was just shocking that this potentially could completely flip my life over and basically shut my business down and everything that my family enjoys doing."

What Happens Next

Public consultations and planning discussions are expected to continue as Alto weighs possible routes and feedback from affected communities, according to CTV News.

Opponents have said they will keep organizing and pressing government officials for changes or safeguards as the project moves forward.

In a polarized era, the center is dismissed as bland. At Newsweek, ours is different: The Courageous Center—it's not "both sides," it's sharp, challenging and alive with ideas. We follow facts, not factions. If that sounds like the kind of journalism you want to see thrive, we need you.

When you become a Newsweek Member, you support a mission to keep the center strong and vibrant. Members enjoy: Ad-free browsing, exclusive content and editor conversations. Help keep the center courageous. Join today.

View 0 Comments

Request Reprint & Licensing

Submit Correction

View Editorial & AI Guidelines