...
By James Roberts
0
Share
Newsweek is a Trust Project member
See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.
Investment in artificial intelligence continues to accelerate across industries, reflecting growing confidence in its potential to support innovation, efficiency and new ways of working. According to a 2026 AI index report by Stanford University, global corporate investment in AI reached $581.7 billion in 2025, representing a substantial increase from the previous year. At the same time, organizations are expanding AI adoption across business functions, signaling that it has become an increasingly important part of long-term business planning.
As adoption grows, another question is becoming more relevant: how much investment is reaching the people expected to work alongside these technologies? Another industry report by McKinsey found that 88 percent of organizations now use AI in at least one business function, although many remain in the early stages of scaling enterprise-wide initiatives. This suggests that technological implementation often progresses alongside an ongoing process of organizational adaptation, where leadership and workforce readiness continue to evolve.
That transition extends well beyond technical capability. According to a World Economic Forum insight report, if the world’s workforce were made up of 100 people, 59 would need upskilling or reskilling by 2030. Such findings illustrate a growing conversation about the relationship between technological progress and the employee experience.
Read More on Essays
These trends point toward a broader leadership challenge. AI can strengthen productivity, automate routine work and expand access to information, yet organizations may realize greater value when equal attention is given to the people using those tools. Skills such as trust, collaboration, adaptability and thoughtful decision-making often influence whether technology becomes fully integrated into everyday work, making human development an increasingly meaningful part of the conversation.
Dr. Robin Hills, Director of Ei4Change, an emotional intelligence education and professional development organization, believes this balance will become increasingly significant. Widely recognized for his contributions to emotional intelligence, including honors from the International Association of Top Professionals and the Icon of Innovation 2025 award by The Arabia Business magazine, Hills emphasizes that organizational success over the coming decade may depend as much on emotionally intelligent leadership as technological capability. “AI can process information with extraordinary speed,” he says. “People create meaning from information, and meaning is what inspires commitment, trust and purposeful action.”
Hills embraces artificial intelligence as a valuable tool and regularly incorporates it into his own work. From his perspective, the conversation is about using technology thoughtfully while continuing to strengthen distinctly human capabilities. He believes many organizations devote considerable attention to productivity gains while giving comparatively less attention to developing the interpersonal skills that help people collaborate effectively through change.
...
This perspective becomes increasingly relevant as workplaces continue to evolve. Employees may become more productive while finding fewer opportunities for meaningful connection. Managers often discover that trust requires greater attention within hybrid teams. Communication can become increasingly transactional as digital interactions replace spontaneous conversations, while conflict, feedback and difficult discussions call for emotional awareness that technology alone cannot provide. Automation may simplify many tasks, yet resilience, belonging and wellbeing continue to depend on human relationships.
“Leadership begins with understanding people before asking them to embrace change,” Hills explains. “Every meaningful conversation offers an opportunity to strengthen trust, especially when people feel heard, respected and included.” He believes empathy, psychological safety, constructive feedback and conflict resolution deserve recognition as practical leadership capabilities that influence engagement and performance across every industry.
For Hills, emotional intelligence represents a collection of power skills that support better judgment, stronger relationships and more thoughtful leadership. He also believes education and professional development have an opportunity to evolve alongside AI by encouraging critical thinking instead of simple information retrieval. Evaluating ideas, applying personal values, exercising creativity, understanding motivation and building authentic relationships remain deeply human activities that enrich the contribution technology can make.
That philosophy is reflected in the broader work of Ei4Change, which has a longstanding focus on helping individuals and organizations apply emotional intelligence in practical workplace situations. Through research-informed learning, the organization contributes to a wider conversation about leadership development, resilience, communication and collaboration as AI becomes more deeply integrated into professional life. “Technology will continue to evolve,” Dr. Hills says. “Our responsibility is to develop people with the confidence, curiosity and emotional awareness to evolve alongside it.”
The future of work will likely continue to combine technological advancement with human adaptability. AI will undoubtedly remain an important business capability, while leadership, empathy, critical thinking and purpose may become increasingly valuable qualities for organizations navigating continual change.
As investment in AI continues to grow, investment in human intelligence may become an equally important consideration. Technology has the capacity to expand what organizations can accomplish, while emotionally intelligent people often determine how effectively those possibilities are translated into meaningful outcomes.
View 0 Comments
Submit Correction
View Editorial & AI Guidelines