...

By Suzanne Blake

Reporter

0

Share

Newsweek is a Trust Project member

See more of our trusted coverage when you search.Prefer Newsweek on Googleto see more of our trusted coverage when you search.

Independent U.S. Senator Bernie Sanders is promoting a proposal that would provide direct payments of up to $12,000 to American families as part of a broader plan to tax billionaire wealth and expand economic support for working households.

The bill introduced by Sanders would mean Americans receive $3,000 direct payments as a result of a higher billionaire tax.

The idea, highlighted during his recent "Fighting Oligarchy" tour stops, has drawn attention as he pushes for progressive candidates and sweeping economic reform.

Read More on Politics

“What we are talking about is not radical. What is radical is when so few have so much,” Sanders said at a rally event in Orono, Maine, this month. “It is not radical to say that we should not have the highest rate of childhood poverty of almost any nation, and that so many of our seniors live in economic despair.”

Why It Matters

The proposal taps into a growing debate over wealth inequality and the rising cost of living. At the center of the debate is whether the federal government should provide direct cash support to households.

Policies once associated with the progressive left, such as direct payments, are gaining more mainstream attention.

...

What To Know

According to Sanders and Representative Ro Khanna, who co-introduced the Make Billionaires Pay Their Fair Share Act in the House, their new bill would tax billionaire wealth and redistribute it to working families.

The proposal calls for:

• Direct payments to families, up to $12,000 annually
• Higher taxes on billionaires and ultra-wealthy individuals
• Investments in programs supporting healthcare, education and working-class households

“What Sanders’ wealth tax proposal illustrates is the vast amount of wealth that is held by a small number of Americans.,” Drew Powers, founder of Illinois-based Powers Financial Group, told Newsweek. “A 5 percent tax on fewer than one-thousand billionaires could possibly provide meaningful financial relief for an estimated 250 million Americans. That is an astounding figure by any measure.”

What Would This Mean for Families?

Under the Sanders–Khanna proposal, individuals could receive $3,000 each and a family of four could receive up to $12,000 total.

These payments would be funded through a 5 percent annual tax on billionaire wealth, targeting roughly 900 ultra-wealthy Americans.

When would payments arrive?

• The legislation suggests payments would begin in the first year after implementation
• However, no exact timeline is guaranteed

The timing of payments would depend on when the bill made its way out of Congress and how quickly the IRS or Treasury could distribute payments.

Would the payments be taxable?

This part of the legislation remains uncertain.

The bill does not clearly specify tax treatment, but past stimulus payments (like COVID-era checks) were not taxed as income.

However, the rules would depend on how Congress structures the program and explicit language in the law once it's fully passed.

Would this affect benefits like SNAP or Medicaid?

Based on similar past programs and pandemic stimulus payments, this type of money has been excluded from income calculations for federal benefits.

However, the rules would vary depending on how the program is designed in Congress and state-level administration of the payments.

How does this compare to past payments?

This proposal is not entirely new, but it builds on recent policy ideas.

COVID-19 stimulus checks (2020–2021):

• Direct payments up to $1,200–$1,400 per person
• Widely distributed across income groups
• Not taxed

Child Tax Credit (CTC) expansion (2021):

• Monthly payments to families with children
• Reduced child poverty significantly (temporarily)

Sanders proposal (2026):

• Larger lump-sum payments ($12,000 for a family of four)
• Funded specifically by a wealth tax on billionaires
• More targeted toward income thresholds ($150K and below)

What Sanders Has Said

Sanders, the senior senator from Vermont, has been actively promoting the idea during his recent rallies, including events in Maine.

“At a time of unprecedented income and wealth inequality, this legislation demands that the billionaire class in America finally pay their fair share of taxes so that we can create an economy that works for all of us, not just the 1 percent,” Sanders said in a statement. “We can no longer tolerate a corrupt tax code that enables billionaires to pay a lower tax rate than the average worker."

Over the past 50 years, $79 trillion in U.S. wealth has been redistributed from the bottom 90 percent to the top 1 percent, Sanders added. “Enough is enough. Billionaires cannot have it all. It is time to enact a wealth tax on billionaires and use this revenue to address some of the major crises facing working families, the children, the elderly, the sick and the most vulnerable.”

What the Legislation Says

The bill introduced in Congress focuses on taxing extreme wealth to fund public programs, calling for the funds to shift from billionaires toward direct payments for families and social programs to reduce economic inequality across the country.

Some financial experts worry the plan would not solve larger issues within the U.S. economy. “The idea is novel and speaks more toward his redistribution approach, but it does little to solve the underlying systemic issues,” Kevin Thompson, CEO of 9i Capital Group and host of the 9innings podcast, told Newsweek. “When I hear direct payments, I see two things happening almost immediately: those dollars ultimately flowing back to corporations through higher consumption, and more fuel being added to an already inflationary environment.”

What Supporters Say

Backers of the proposal argue there are many potential benefits:

• Direct payments could help families manage rising costs and reduce poverty
• Taxing billionaires could also address wealth inequality
• There’d be more money to fund social programs without increasing middle-class taxes

Criticism and Skepticism

Critics, many of them conservative, have raised concerns about:

• Cost of the program
• Potential economic impact of higher taxes
• Whether direct payments could increase inflation or discourage work

There is also the question of whether the proposal has a realistic path through Congress.

“As alluring of an idea is for $12,000 payments to be sent to many working and middle class Americans, the reality is that any potential wealth tax that could be implemented would have other more pressing fiscal purposes it could feel,” Alex Beene, financial literacy instructor for the University of Tennessee at Martin, told Newsweek.

“With a ballooning federal deficit and upcoming depletion of the Social Security trust fund, any increase in taxation would be more wisely applied to fill those gaps instead of supplying direct payments.”

California’s Billionaire Tax Proposal

Sanders’ proposal is not emerging in a vacuum. Similar ideas targeting the wealth of billionaires rather than income are increasingly being debated at both the state and federal level.

One of the most closely watched efforts is unfolding in California, where voters may soon weigh in on a proposed “Billionaire Tax” in November.

This tax would impose a one-time 5 percent tax on net worth above $1 billion. That would mean just around 200 ultra-wealthy residents would be impacted by raising about $100 billion over several years.

While it could help fund healthcare programs and public education, some state leaders fear the measure would lead to wealth migration and economic impact outside of California.

What Happens Next

• The legislation has been introduced in Congress
• It faces political hurdles and debate over the proposed taxation and spending
• However, the proposal is expected to remain a central talking point in upcoming political campaigns

“If AI and robotics progress to the point where they take over enough human jobs, then we are going to see a drastic transfer of wealth away from Main Street and straight to Big Tech,” Powers said. “If that happens, a proposal like this, or other forms of Universal Basic Income, may be a necessity.”

View 0 Comments

Request Reprint & Licensing

Submit Correction

View Editorial & AI Guidelines